MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2470521823 · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.017

Libraries and the Affordable Care Act: Helping the Community Understand Health-Care Options

2015· article· en· W2470521823 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martha Earl

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Medical Library Association JMLA · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePublic Health Policies and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActHealth insuranceHealth careMEDLINEInternet privacyPublic relationsNursingBusinessWorld Wide WebMedicineComputer sciencePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the midst of both consumer and health professional confusion about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Francisca Goldsmith writes a practical, clear, and compassionate guide for any librarians assisting information seekers with this topic. Goldsmith, a veteran of both public and academic library service in the United States and Canada, has supplied her expertise in staff development and library instruction through California's Infopeople Project and works with the underserved. Goldsmith knows what library staff and library patrons need to know to respond to community needs for health information, to cope in a practical manner with literacy disparities of all types, and to manage the role of public or consumer health libraries as change agents in a responsible legal and ethical manner. The author's purpose is to engage and encourage public library staff awareness and service planning in supporting local community health. Using knowledge gained from the first open enrollment period in 2013 to 2014, the author assists public library staff with providing information access and community education. The result is this core manual of essential knowledge, resources, library responses, and best practices. Intended to serve as a guide for library staff to tailor their role to the needs of their local communities, Goldsmith offers no singular blueprint. Instead, she provides short chapters, with bullet points for easy reference and task lists to focus planning and goal accomplishment. She is mindful of issues related to staffing and rural or urban settings. Chapter one, “The Affordable Care Act: Overview and Context,” provides the legislative facts and texts, the history, synonyms and editorial names, the role of federal and state governments, insurance exchange/marketplace types, Medicaid, initial outcomes, enrollment, recognition of local needs, project management, and staff awareness. Chapter two, “Health Insurance and Insurance Exchange Structures,” explores the terrain of the insurance exchange and insurance plans, small business health options, Medicaid in relation to the exchange, and health care access and the library. Chapter three, “Know Your Community,” provides the basics of digging more deeply into ethnicity, culture, language, and health literacy. Chapter four, “From Affordable Care Act Policies to Functional Library Tactics,” outlines the goals of the Federal Health Agency and the five policy objectives of the ACA. Goldsmith explains how to extract “library tactics” from the aforementioned policies. Language and technology access issues, especially for diverse populations, merit particular focus. A valuable outline of upcoming changes in the ACA through 2020 helps to keep this book current. Chapter five, “Ethics and Legal Matters Related to Health-Care Information Services,” describes codes of appropriate behavior, especially related to community health care consumers, and ethics in politics, diversity, library collections, legal situations, and technical and technology access. Chapter six, “Health-Care Related Reference Interviewing,” addresses the strong concerns that both public library and consumer health library staff may have in relation to uncovering patrons' real health information needs. Chapter seven, “Literacy, Health Literacy, and Financial Literacy,” succeeds in looking beyond reference and information technology services to the value of household income and motivated skill acquisition. Chapter eight, “Programming to Promote a Healthy Community, on the Ground and Online,” focuses on transparency, partnerships, stakeholders, rural concerns, and online support, with specific public library examples of successful approaches. Chapter nine, “Keeping Up Now, Documenting for Future Advocacy,” emphasizes the need for ongoing awareness, training, and documentation as an advocacy tool. Each chapter ends with questions and tasks, simplifying both learning and planning for library staff using this book. Notes at the end of each chapter also suggest related websites, media, and other resources useful for comprehension and additional research. Questions and tasks are worded clearly and explicitly to encourage best practice. Goldsmith includes three appendixes. Appendix A offers “Affordable Care Act Oversight and Marketplace Access by State.” Appendix B, “Resources,” features information about government regulations and sponsored access assistance, tools for plain language communication and exploration of community needs and assets, and social media resources. Provided tools include the Kaiser Family Foundation, WebJunction, and other key references. Appendix C, “Where Do I Find,” is the quick section provided in place of an index. For this type of handbook, it suffices. This book is recommended for public library staff and for medical or academic library staff who answer consumer health questions or questions about ACA from any patron type, and it is recommended as the primary, go-to-first resource. Exceptional in its practical utility and consumer health expertise, this title is complemented by the newly published The Medical Library Association Guide to Answering Questions about the Affordable Care Act by Emily Vardell (Rowman & Littlefield; 2015. ISBN: 978-1-4422-5536-4).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,793
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,067
Tête enseignante GPT0,403
Écart entre enseignants0,335 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Medical Library Association JMLAMême sujetPublic Health Policies and EducationTravaux en français237 207