MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2472359707

Lifeworks: Political work

2002· article· en· W2472359707 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sherri Telenko

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCultural Industries and Urban Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionAgency (philosophy)PoliticsHealth carePublic relationsWork (physics)Political scienceSociologyMedicineLawVisual artsArtSocial scienceEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although the impetus for his work is often personal experience, the topics that artist Peter Karuna deals with in his video projects become political — perhaps even universal — and are far less navel-gazing than one might expect of contemporary self- reflective video work. The installation he worked on called When You Need Me: Health Care Workers in Ontario is a good example. As part of a larger exhibition called Can I Help You? Canadian Workers at Your Service, the video was recently on display at the Ontario Workers Arts and Heritage Centre (OWAHC) in Hamilton, Ont. The exhibition explored labour issues unique to those who serve the public in fields as diverse as the food industry and health care. Among the artists invited to participate was “Careless Servant Woman,” a collective whose members are Peter Karuna, Anne Milne and their daughter Iris Karuna. What they came up with is a provocative exploration of the day-to-day tasks of health care workers such as nurses and home care workers and the political challenges facing health care today. Criticism of increasing privatization in many sectors, including health care, has become widespread. The artists who participated in the OWAHC project have joined the list of skeptics. According to the centre's press material, home care agencies in Ontario are currently forced to compete for provincial contracts. When an agency loses a contract, many workers lose their jobs and are expected to switch to an agency whose bid has been successful. Seniority, job security and wages are jeopardized, as is the desirability of a career in home care. When You Need Me documents responses to this changing climate through personal interviews with workers. Judging by their comments, not only are working conditions altered, but so is the quality of patient care. Accompanying the video, a room-size installation incorporating fragmented x-ray images of walkers and wheelchairs formed the most symbolic and, consequently, most daunting part of the work. Latex gloves filling a display case were accompanied by words reminding the viewer of their necessity: “mucus,” “lesions,” “sores,” etc. But the exhibition shifted from the political to the personal with the inclusion of a composition: a pillow, several night-lights and a sleeping bag hung on a wall. On the pillow was an image of an elderly woman's face. Beside this arrangement was a statement that set the tone for the room: My mother visited Canada three times. During one of her visits, she was employed by a well-off family as a live-in support worker. She cared for an elderly man. Her wages were very low, but she didn't have to pay for her room and board. In 1990, she left Canada for the last time. After a prolonged illness, she died in poverty. This testimony might hint at the personal experience that spawned this project. But the overriding message is a political one that hits home: supporting the work of home care should be a political priority. Anyone can get sick. And, if we live long enough, we might need a little support in our homes. Let's hope there will be something there for us. Sherri Telenko Hamilton, Ont.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,306

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0400,024
Communication savante0,0160,006
Science ouverte0,0010,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0910,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Même sujetCultural Industries and Urban Development→Travaux en français237 207→