Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the impetus for his work is often personal experience, the topics that artist Peter Karuna deals with in his video projects become political — perhaps even universal — and are far less navel-gazing than one might expect of contemporary self- reflective video work. The installation he worked on called When You Need Me: Health Care Workers in Ontario is a good example. As part of a larger exhibition called Can I Help You? Canadian Workers at Your Service, the video was recently on display at the Ontario Workers Arts and Heritage Centre (OWAHC) in Hamilton, Ont. The exhibition explored labour issues unique to those who serve the public in fields as diverse as the food industry and health care. Among the artists invited to participate was “Careless Servant Woman,” a collective whose members are Peter Karuna, Anne Milne and their daughter Iris Karuna. What they came up with is a provocative exploration of the day-to-day tasks of health care workers such as nurses and home care workers and the political challenges facing health care today. Criticism of increasing privatization in many sectors, including health care, has become widespread. The artists who participated in the OWAHC project have joined the list of skeptics. According to the centre's press material, home care agencies in Ontario are currently forced to compete for provincial contracts. When an agency loses a contract, many workers lose their jobs and are expected to switch to an agency whose bid has been successful. Seniority, job security and wages are jeopardized, as is the desirability of a career in home care. When You Need Me documents responses to this changing climate through personal interviews with workers. Judging by their comments, not only are working conditions altered, but so is the quality of patient care. Accompanying the video, a room-size installation incorporating fragmented x-ray images of walkers and wheelchairs formed the most symbolic and, consequently, most daunting part of the work. Latex gloves filling a display case were accompanied by words reminding the viewer of their necessity: “mucus,” “lesions,” “sores,” etc. But the exhibition shifted from the political to the personal with the inclusion of a composition: a pillow, several night-lights and a sleeping bag hung on a wall. On the pillow was an image of an elderly woman's face. Beside this arrangement was a statement that set the tone for the room: My mother visited Canada three times. During one of her visits, she was employed by a well-off family as a live-in support worker. She cared for an elderly man. Her wages were very low, but she didn't have to pay for her room and board. In 1990, she left Canada for the last time. After a prolonged illness, she died in poverty. This testimony might hint at the personal experience that spawned this project. But the overriding message is a political one that hits home: supporting the work of home care should be a political priority. Anyone can get sick. And, if we live long enough, we might need a little support in our homes. Let's hope there will be something there for us. Sherri Telenko Hamilton, Ont.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.040 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".