MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2473931590 · doi:10.82308/6989

Using occupational performance coaching to target teachers' perception of their own performance, satisfaction, and self- efficacy in supporting the self-regulation of their students: A pilot study

2014· article· en· W2473931590 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline Hui

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoachingPsychologyPerceptionIntervention (counseling)Medical educationSelf-efficacyApplied psychologySocial psychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The policy of inclusive education has changed the makeup of the Canadian classroom. Today's elementary school teacher is faced with the challenge of meeting the myriad classroom needs of their students, many of whom demonstrate disruptive classroom behaviours due to different underlying diagnoses. It is known that these behaviours have a large impact on a teachers' stress level. This increased stress can lead to reduced performance, dissatisfaction in performance, and lower self-efficacy. Only 13% of surveyed Canadian teachers felt they could manage the challenge of these behaviours. Preliminary studies of the Alert Program®, an innovative program which promotes the use of sensorimotor strategies to enable students to attain and maintain an appropriate level of arousal and self-regulation for learning, have shown effectiveness. Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC), an occupation and client centred approach, has been shown to be successful in helping adults meet their occupational goals.The primary objective of this master's thesis was to estimate the extent to which elementary school teachers' perceived performance, satisfaction of performance, and self-efficacy changed following participation in a one day training and weekly OPC on the use of tools for self-regulation of their students. This study used a multiple case replication study design. A cohort of regular classroom elementary school teachers (n=11) were recruited from the Quebec Eastern Townships School Board. Intervention took place over a period of 11.3 weeks. The intervention included a one day workshop, based on the Alert Program®, entitled Tools to Improve Attention and Self-regulation for Students in the Classroom and was followed by eight individual sessions of OPC with the teachers. The key outcome measures were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), used to assess the teachers' perceived performance and satisfaction performance in supporting self-regulation of their students, and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) to evaluate functional goal attainment. The Teachers' Self-Efficacy Scale-Classroom Management (TSES-CM) was used to measure teacher's self-efficacy in classroom behaviour management. Open ended questions were used in semi-structured interviews and a daily log was filled out by the teachers to collect data on the sensorimotor strategies implemented in their classroom. The results of this pilot study suggest that the use of a workshop and OPC sessions with teachers improved their perceived perception, satisfaction and self-efficacy when working with students with self-regulation issues. Perceived performance improved in 82% of participants, perceived satisfaction improved in 91% and self-efficacy improved in 73% of participants. Overall results on outcome measures indicated clinically significant change with a probability of response at 0.77 (CI=0.58, 0.85). The results of GAS indicate that progress was noted in teachers as well as students. Preliminary results suggest that the use of OPC as a school-based OT intervention with teachers can be beneficial.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai non randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,054
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,108

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsTravaux en français237 207