MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2473931590 · doi:10.82308/6989

Using occupational performance coaching to target teachers' perception of their own performance, satisfaction, and self- efficacy in supporting the self-regulation of their students: A pilot study

2014· article· en· W2473931590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline Hui

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingPsychologyPerceptionIntervention (counseling)Medical educationSelf-efficacyApplied psychologySocial psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The policy of inclusive education has changed the makeup of the Canadian classroom. Today's elementary school teacher is faced with the challenge of meeting the myriad classroom needs of their students, many of whom demonstrate disruptive classroom behaviours due to different underlying diagnoses. It is known that these behaviours have a large impact on a teachers' stress level. This increased stress can lead to reduced performance, dissatisfaction in performance, and lower self-efficacy. Only 13% of surveyed Canadian teachers felt they could manage the challenge of these behaviours. Preliminary studies of the Alert Program®, an innovative program which promotes the use of sensorimotor strategies to enable students to attain and maintain an appropriate level of arousal and self-regulation for learning, have shown effectiveness. Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC), an occupation and client centred approach, has been shown to be successful in helping adults meet their occupational goals.The primary objective of this master's thesis was to estimate the extent to which elementary school teachers' perceived performance, satisfaction of performance, and self-efficacy changed following participation in a one day training and weekly OPC on the use of tools for self-regulation of their students. This study used a multiple case replication study design. A cohort of regular classroom elementary school teachers (n=11) were recruited from the Quebec Eastern Townships School Board. Intervention took place over a period of 11.3 weeks. The intervention included a one day workshop, based on the Alert Program®, entitled Tools to Improve Attention and Self-regulation for Students in the Classroom and was followed by eight individual sessions of OPC with the teachers. The key outcome measures were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), used to assess the teachers' perceived performance and satisfaction performance in supporting self-regulation of their students, and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) to evaluate functional goal attainment. The Teachers' Self-Efficacy Scale-Classroom Management (TSES-CM) was used to measure teacher's self-efficacy in classroom behaviour management. Open ended questions were used in semi-structured interviews and a daily log was filled out by the teachers to collect data on the sensorimotor strategies implemented in their classroom. The results of this pilot study suggest that the use of a workshop and OPC sessions with teachers improved their perceived perception, satisfaction and self-efficacy when working with students with self-regulation issues. Perceived performance improved in 82% of participants, perceived satisfaction improved in 91% and self-efficacy improved in 73% of participants. Overall results on outcome measures indicated clinically significant change with a probability of response at 0.77 (CI=0.58, 0.85). The results of GAS indicate that progress was noted in teachers as well as students. Preliminary results suggest that the use of OPC as a school-based OT intervention with teachers can be beneficial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports→French-language works237,207→