MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2477403000 · doi:10.2307/3659291

[sans titre]

2005· article· en· W2477403000 sur OpenAlexaffabout
James Pritchard, Marcus Rediker

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of American History · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMaritime Security and History
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDialecticArgument (complex analysis)RomanceLawOrder (exchange)State (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistorySociologyWorking classSocial orderDemocracyLiteraturePolitical sciencePoliticsArtPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Piracy, according to this author, was more about liberty, brotherhood, and equality than robbery, violence, and murder. Indeed, in Marcus Rediker's eyes, pirates were almost early modern democratic socialists. Their opponents were the ones who made them engage in robbery, violence, and murder. Piracy was also very narrowly focused about the 1710s and 1720s and the generation of infamous, seafaring thieves that underlies all modern, romanticized images of pirates. The author's own image of them is more romantic than he thinks, but he still knows a great deal about pirates and has many interesting, useful, and insightful things to say about them. The author, who professes history at the University of Pittsburgh, has been writing and publishing books about sailors, including pirates, for at least a quarter of a century. In this, his latest book, he has arranged his material in eight brief chapters of roughly equal length in order to present a social and cultural history of pirates at the end of several centuries of development; by the early eighteenth century, he argues, piracy had evolved into a dialectic of terror between poor, working-class sailors and the early modern capitalist state. After setting his argument out in the first chapter, in the next four chapters he presents some interesting facts and figures about who became pirates, the social organization of their ships and activities, and their social relations with each other and with their enemies. Some of this has appeared in earlier studies. Rediker is adamant that pirates were poor working seamen recruited largely through mutiny and by volunteers from captured merchantmen. He pays little attention to coerced recruits and makes no mention of others such as poor white colonists from West Indian colonies, the economic detritus of plantation economies, who fled their oppression ashore. Pirates' ship organization was intended to achieve control of their working conditions, and their banditry was a cry for justice. Far from preying upon one another, pirates had a profound sense of community and brotherhood. The final three chapters deal with special topics; women pirates are located within the context of working-class culture, and pirates became demonized only when their enemies began to extirpate them. Finally, out of an exploration of the interrelated themes of death, apocalypse, hell, and self-destruction, Rediker sees piracy fundamentally as a struggle for life against socially organized death. His pirates are collectivist, anti-authoritarian, egalitarian folk heroes with enlightened views on liberty, transvestites, and slaves. Unfortunately, for a book entitled Villains of All Nations, the evidence and argument are almost exclusively anglocentric, and, while the behavior of these early eighteenth-century pirates underlies their modern image, the author is insufficiently skeptical of the romanticism in his own sources. That said, he has written an analytical, well-crafted book with a tightly focused argument containing some solid facts.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,696
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of American HistoryMême sujetMaritime Security and HistoryTravaux en français237 207