Bibliographic record
Abstract
Piracy, according to this author, was more about liberty, brotherhood, and equality than robbery, violence, and murder. Indeed, in Marcus Rediker's eyes, pirates were almost early modern democratic socialists. Their opponents were the ones who made them engage in robbery, violence, and murder. Piracy was also very narrowly focused about the 1710s and 1720s and the generation of infamous, seafaring thieves that underlies all modern, romanticized images of pirates. The author's own image of them is more romantic than he thinks, but he still knows a great deal about pirates and has many interesting, useful, and insightful things to say about them. The author, who professes history at the University of Pittsburgh, has been writing and publishing books about sailors, including pirates, for at least a quarter of a century. In this, his latest book, he has arranged his material in eight brief chapters of roughly equal length in order to present a social and cultural history of pirates at the end of several centuries of development; by the early eighteenth century, he argues, piracy had evolved into a dialectic of terror between poor, working-class sailors and the early modern capitalist state. After setting his argument out in the first chapter, in the next four chapters he presents some interesting facts and figures about who became pirates, the social organization of their ships and activities, and their social relations with each other and with their enemies. Some of this has appeared in earlier studies. Rediker is adamant that pirates were poor working seamen recruited largely through mutiny and by volunteers from captured merchantmen. He pays little attention to coerced recruits and makes no mention of others such as poor white colonists from West Indian colonies, the economic detritus of plantation economies, who fled their oppression ashore. Pirates' ship organization was intended to achieve control of their working conditions, and their banditry was a cry for justice. Far from preying upon one another, pirates had a profound sense of community and brotherhood. The final three chapters deal with special topics; women pirates are located within the context of working-class culture, and pirates became demonized only when their enemies began to extirpate them. Finally, out of an exploration of the interrelated themes of death, apocalypse, hell, and self-destruction, Rediker sees piracy fundamentally as a struggle for life against socially organized death. His pirates are collectivist, anti-authoritarian, egalitarian folk heroes with enlightened views on liberty, transvestites, and slaves. Unfortunately, for a book entitled Villains of All Nations, the evidence and argument are almost exclusively anglocentric, and, while the behavior of these early eighteenth-century pirates underlies their modern image, the author is insufficiently skeptical of the romanticism in his own sources. That said, he has written an analytical, well-crafted book with a tightly focused argument containing some solid facts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".