MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2479809460 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.3147.3147

Multiclonality In Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Analysis Of Clonal Progression and Selection

2013· article· en· W2479809460 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Gwynivere A Davies, Ian Chin‐Yee

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlasma cell dyscrasiaMultiple myelomaMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceMedicineInternal medicineSerum protein electrophoresisPlasma cell neoplasmDyscrasiaMonoclonalPlasmacytomaOncologyPlasma cellImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyImmunoglobulin light chain

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Genomic instability and multiclonality is the hallmark of many cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Genetic alterations and clonal prominence occur over time as patients undergo various treatment modalities and can be followed by examining factors such as copy number abnormalities. Occasionally more than one monoclonal spike is noted on the serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) indicating the existence of several distinct populations of clonal plasma cells producing a measurable amount of monoclonal (M) protein. Using routinely measureable clinical assays, SPEP and serum free light chains (SFL), we set out to identify the prevalence of multiclonality in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia, and to examine the natural history and effect treatment practices have on clones over time. Methods We retrospectively identified adult patients who were registered with the London Regional Cancer Program (LRCP), a tertiary care referral center in London, Ontario, Canada, since 2000 with a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS), smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma or solitary plasmacytoma. Our current SPEP quantitation method has been in use since September 2004, so these SPEP results of patients identified from our initial search were examined for evidence of multiple monoclonal peaks as a surrogate marker for multiclonality. Inclusion criteria required a new diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasia since the year 2000 and biclonal/multiclonal M protein peaks on SPEP followed through the LRCP. Demographics, SPEP results, treatment modalities and last recorded follow up or death for these patients was recorded. Outcome measures included quantification of complete remission, partial remission, very good partial remission and no response following systemic therapy to look for concordance in clone response. Results Since 2000, 1402 patients met the inclusion criteria; 144 patients met our surrogate criteria for multiclonality, representing a prevalence of approximately 10%. The majority of patients had MGUS (58, 40.3%) or MM (70, 48.6%) at first identification. Of these patients, 96 (66.7%) were male and the average age at diagnosis was 65.9 years. 58 (40.3%), primarily with MGUS, had no treatment and thus cannot be examined for treatment selective pressures. The number of clones identified ranged from two (114, 79.2%) to five. 62 (43.1%) had clones that were of similar immunoglobulin and light chain subtype, and half of patients had multiple clones identified at the same time point compared with development of clones during follow up investigations. In order to examine for concordance in treatment response between clones, we required that clones have a pre- and post- treatment value and have received systemic therapy with a measurable nadir. Only 26 patients had values that met these criteria, mainly due to clones disappearing with time, including 7 patients with no treatment, or oral treatment without recurrence and thus not quantifiable for comparison. Of these 26, approximately half showed discordance between clones, even in those with clones of the same M protein subtype. Of note, 4 discordant patients initially showed the same response to treatment and later developed divergent responses. Discussion Multiclonality in plasma cell neoplasms is a common occurrence, with a prevalence of 10% in our patient population. The use of SPEP and SFL as surrogate markers for multiclonality likely underestimates the true prevalence of multiple clones measured by genetic methods due to insensitivity to resolved non secretory clones or multiple clones secreting similar immunoglobulin. As seen in previous studies, our results demonstrate that plasma cell clone response can diverge over time, potentially spontaneously or as a result of selection pressures imposed by therapy. These findings may help direct therapy and suggests prognosis as clonal divergence could herald genetic changes associated with therapy resistant disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→