MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multiclonality In Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Analysis Of Clonal Progression and Selection

2013· article· en· W2479809460 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gwynivere A Davies, Ian Chin‐Yee

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma cell dyscrasiaMultiple myelomaMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceMedicineInternal medicineSerum protein electrophoresisPlasma cell neoplasmDyscrasiaMonoclonalPlasmacytomaOncologyPlasma cellImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyImmunoglobulin light chain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Genomic instability and multiclonality is the hallmark of many cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Genetic alterations and clonal prominence occur over time as patients undergo various treatment modalities and can be followed by examining factors such as copy number abnormalities. Occasionally more than one monoclonal spike is noted on the serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) indicating the existence of several distinct populations of clonal plasma cells producing a measurable amount of monoclonal (M) protein. Using routinely measureable clinical assays, SPEP and serum free light chains (SFL), we set out to identify the prevalence of multiclonality in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia, and to examine the natural history and effect treatment practices have on clones over time. Methods We retrospectively identified adult patients who were registered with the London Regional Cancer Program (LRCP), a tertiary care referral center in London, Ontario, Canada, since 2000 with a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS), smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma or solitary plasmacytoma. Our current SPEP quantitation method has been in use since September 2004, so these SPEP results of patients identified from our initial search were examined for evidence of multiple monoclonal peaks as a surrogate marker for multiclonality. Inclusion criteria required a new diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasia since the year 2000 and biclonal/multiclonal M protein peaks on SPEP followed through the LRCP. Demographics, SPEP results, treatment modalities and last recorded follow up or death for these patients was recorded. Outcome measures included quantification of complete remission, partial remission, very good partial remission and no response following systemic therapy to look for concordance in clone response. Results Since 2000, 1402 patients met the inclusion criteria; 144 patients met our surrogate criteria for multiclonality, representing a prevalence of approximately 10%. The majority of patients had MGUS (58, 40.3%) or MM (70, 48.6%) at first identification. Of these patients, 96 (66.7%) were male and the average age at diagnosis was 65.9 years. 58 (40.3%), primarily with MGUS, had no treatment and thus cannot be examined for treatment selective pressures. The number of clones identified ranged from two (114, 79.2%) to five. 62 (43.1%) had clones that were of similar immunoglobulin and light chain subtype, and half of patients had multiple clones identified at the same time point compared with development of clones during follow up investigations. In order to examine for concordance in treatment response between clones, we required that clones have a pre- and post- treatment value and have received systemic therapy with a measurable nadir. Only 26 patients had values that met these criteria, mainly due to clones disappearing with time, including 7 patients with no treatment, or oral treatment without recurrence and thus not quantifiable for comparison. Of these 26, approximately half showed discordance between clones, even in those with clones of the same M protein subtype. Of note, 4 discordant patients initially showed the same response to treatment and later developed divergent responses. Discussion Multiclonality in plasma cell neoplasms is a common occurrence, with a prevalence of 10% in our patient population. The use of SPEP and SFL as surrogate markers for multiclonality likely underestimates the true prevalence of multiple clones measured by genetic methods due to insensitivity to resolved non secretory clones or multiple clones secreting similar immunoglobulin. As seen in previous studies, our results demonstrate that plasma cell clone response can diverge over time, potentially spontaneously or as a result of selection pressures imposed by therapy. These findings may help direct therapy and suggests prognosis as clonal divergence could herald genetic changes associated with therapy resistant disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→