MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W248095510

What Germans Really Think. (A Closing View)

2002· article· en· W248095510 sur OpenAlex
Heino Fassbender, Michael Kliger, Jürgen Kluge

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe McKinsey Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomic miracleUnemploymentGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceGermanEconomyEconomicsPoliticsEconomic growthLawHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The people are ready for change and for the tough decisions needed to push the economy. Their leaders now have a chance to engage them in a serious dialogue about economic reform and revival. Germany, once the home of the Wirtschaftswunder (miracle economy), has had the slowest or second-slowest economy in the European Union for six years running--unemployment often tops 10 percent, while heavy government spending has pushed the budget deficit close to the limits for members of the eurozone. Despite the debilitating effects of unification more than a decade ago, the sluggish economy is often blamed on the Germans themselves: they are a people opposed to economic risk, so the thinking goes, too firmly attached to generous government social programs and protective labor laws. But an extensive on-line survey gives the lie to this stereotype, thus suggesting that policy makers have room to embark on bold reform measures that could unleash the hidden economic energy of the German people. The on-line Perspektive-Deutschland survey, (1) which was commissioned by McKinsey, T-Online (an Internet service provider), and the Stern publishing group, attracted responses from 170,000 Germans, making it Europe's largest in-depth an-line survey. Same of the results were expected--for instance, the large gap in the quality of life between the farmer East and West Germany--but the survey also uncovered same important new insights; it suggests that Germans may be mare ready than their politicians far economic reforms that could salve same of the country's problems. Indeed, in the same spirit that imbued the Wirtschafts-wunder years (the 1950s and early 1960s), the people seem keen to take the initiative and to work hard if they aren't hindered by the political system, its regulations, and its inflexibility. To begin with, Germans are mare willing than is commonly realized to exchange jab security far independence. About 9 percent are already self-employed, and fully 33 percent mare could either definitely see themselves as self-employed or imagine being so under certain circumstances (Exhibit 1). For these people, federal and state regulations were the greatest obstacles. One recent study ranked 85 countries by the degree of regulation they impose an new businesses, with the least regulated among them tapping the list. Germany ranked 40th, far behind leaders such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark. (2) If Germany's entrepreneurial spirit could be tapped, it would clearly be a strong jab creator in bath east and west. Yet a study carried out in 2000 showed that even in Germany's entrepreneurial centers--Dusseldorf, Munich, and Stuttgart-less than a quarter of the companies with annual sales of mare than $50 million had been founded from 1985 to 2000, as compared with about 73 percent in Silicon Vall ey and 58 percent in Austin, Texas. (3) The time could also be right far reforming the country's inflexible labor market regulations, a key barrier to greater productivity and growth. Germany's employment laws and traditions emphasize jab and income security and make it hard far employers to fire people or to match their pay to performance. Nevertheless, 45 percent of those responding to cur survey would welcome pay based an results; 61 percent would like to have mare influence aver the development of their careers and greater responsibility in their jabs. Furthermore, Germans seem willing to contemplate lower levels of government support than politicians generally acknowledge. The pay-as-you-go state pension system is starting to creak, for example, and 88 percent of the respondents are convinced that private plans will be needed to supplement the state program. In a country accustomed to free university education, only about a third of the respondents said that they would not under any circumstances pay part of the cost of improving the system. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,511
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle