MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W248095510

What Germans Really Think. (A Closing View)

2002· article· en· W248095510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heino Fassbender, Michael Kliger, Jürgen Kluge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe McKinsey Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic miracleUnemploymentGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceGermanEconomyEconomicsPoliticsEconomic growthLawHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The people are ready for change and for the tough decisions needed to push the economy. Their leaders now have a chance to engage them in a serious dialogue about economic reform and revival. Germany, once the home of the Wirtschaftswunder (miracle economy), has had the slowest or second-slowest economy in the European Union for six years running--unemployment often tops 10 percent, while heavy government spending has pushed the budget deficit close to the limits for members of the eurozone. Despite the debilitating effects of unification more than a decade ago, the sluggish economy is often blamed on the Germans themselves: they are a people opposed to economic risk, so the thinking goes, too firmly attached to generous government social programs and protective labor laws. But an extensive on-line survey gives the lie to this stereotype, thus suggesting that policy makers have room to embark on bold reform measures that could unleash the hidden economic energy of the German people. The on-line Perspektive-Deutschland survey, (1) which was commissioned by McKinsey, T-Online (an Internet service provider), and the Stern publishing group, attracted responses from 170,000 Germans, making it Europe's largest in-depth an-line survey. Same of the results were expected--for instance, the large gap in the quality of life between the farmer East and West Germany--but the survey also uncovered same important new insights; it suggests that Germans may be mare ready than their politicians far economic reforms that could salve same of the country's problems. Indeed, in the same spirit that imbued the Wirtschafts-wunder years (the 1950s and early 1960s), the people seem keen to take the initiative and to work hard if they aren't hindered by the political system, its regulations, and its inflexibility. To begin with, Germans are mare willing than is commonly realized to exchange jab security far independence. About 9 percent are already self-employed, and fully 33 percent mare could either definitely see themselves as self-employed or imagine being so under certain circumstances (Exhibit 1). For these people, federal and state regulations were the greatest obstacles. One recent study ranked 85 countries by the degree of regulation they impose an new businesses, with the least regulated among them tapping the list. Germany ranked 40th, far behind leaders such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark. (2) If Germany's entrepreneurial spirit could be tapped, it would clearly be a strong jab creator in bath east and west. Yet a study carried out in 2000 showed that even in Germany's entrepreneurial centers--Dusseldorf, Munich, and Stuttgart-less than a quarter of the companies with annual sales of mare than $50 million had been founded from 1985 to 2000, as compared with about 73 percent in Silicon Vall ey and 58 percent in Austin, Texas. (3) The time could also be right far reforming the country's inflexible labor market regulations, a key barrier to greater productivity and growth. Germany's employment laws and traditions emphasize jab and income security and make it hard far employers to fire people or to match their pay to performance. Nevertheless, 45 percent of those responding to cur survey would welcome pay based an results; 61 percent would like to have mare influence aver the development of their careers and greater responsibility in their jabs. Furthermore, Germans seem willing to contemplate lower levels of government support than politicians generally acknowledge. The pay-as-you-go state pension system is starting to creak, for example, and 88 percent of the respondents are convinced that private plans will be needed to supplement the state program. In a country accustomed to free university education, only about a third of the respondents said that they would not under any circumstances pay part of the cost of improving the system. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe McKinsey QuarterlySame topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207