From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights: Late Medieval and Early Modern Political Thought, 1300-1600
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This volume is the second in a series by Monahan chronicling the history of political thought in western Europe.Although the subtide indicates that this is supposed to be a broad history of political thought covering the period, 1 300-1600, that is not the case.This is a group of thematic approaches to Renaissance and Reformation intellectual history that, while having some interesting aspects, is not a comprehensive study.To understand the problems of From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights, you must put it into the context of Monahan' s overall series.According to the introduction, there is at least one further volume planned in the series that began with Consent, Coercion and Limit: The Medieval Origins of Parliamentary Democracy (1987).This first work examined the medieval poHtical tradition, with special emphasis on the twelfth through fourteenth centuries.Monahan' s theme, as stated in the subtitle, was to trace the development of parliamentary democracy, not to survey the entire medieval political tradition.Consent, Coercion and Limit covered a considerable amount of material that might reasonably be expected to appear in the second book, so scholars who are not aware of Monahan's first volume would find some disturbing lacunae if the second volume is read alone.(For instance, Marsilius of Padua, who appears as a marginal figure in From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights, is featured prominently along with other fourteenth- century thinkers in the penultimate section of Consent, Coercion and Limit).Similarly, as Monahan intends to continue this series in a third volume "whose primary focus will be theories of policy that are recognizably 'scientific'" (p. 1 1) the cut-off date of 1600 is deceptive.Some important figures from the sixteenth century, Jean Bodin among them, are absent from this study.While the author's justification for doing so seems sound, their absence is unexpected given the tide's promise.From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights also lacks the sharp focus of the first volume.Where earlier Monahan kept to the history of parliamentary democracy, in this volume he attempts to cover a number of approaches.He has abandoned the chronological approach of Consent, Coercion and Limit, where he treated the parliamentary thinkers century by century.From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights favours a multi-thematic treatment of the material.Topics including civic republicanism, constitutionalism and the Reformation are useful organizing principles for the chapters, though, as Monahan admits, there are awkward gaps left to fill, as evinced by the separate section devoted to the Spanish neo-scholasdcs such as Vitoria and Suarez while also attempting to integrate humanist Juan Luis Vives into the same analysisa less-than-successful proposition.Discussion of a few individual thinkers and their works constitutes the bulk of each section, after Monahan provides a broad context for that school of political thought.By arranging his material in thematic sections, Monahan categorizes the political thinkers into pigeonholes which are not
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».