MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480961310 · doi:10.33137/rr.v32i3.11581

From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights: Late Medieval and Early Modern Political Thought, 1300-1600

2009· article· en· W2480961310 on OpenAlex
Arthur P. Monahan, Janice Liedl

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholasticismPoliticsHumanismSchismConstitutionalismTolerationLawPhilosophyHumanitiesMartyrClassicsReligious studiesHistoryTheologyPolitical scienceDemocracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume is the second in a series by Monahan chronicling the history of political thought in western Europe.Although the subtide indicates that this is supposed to be a broad history of political thought covering the period, 1 300-1600, that is not the case.This is a group of thematic approaches to Renaissance and Reformation intellectual history that, while having some interesting aspects, is not a comprehensive study.To understand the problems of From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights, you must put it into the context of Monahan' s overall series.According to the introduction, there is at least one further volume planned in the series that began with Consent, Coercion and Limit: The Medieval Origins of Parliamentary Democracy (1987).This first work examined the medieval poHtical tradition, with special emphasis on the twelfth through fourteenth centuries.Monahan' s theme, as stated in the subtitle, was to trace the development of parliamentary democracy, not to survey the entire medieval political tradition.Consent, Coercion and Limit covered a considerable amount of material that might reasonably be expected to appear in the second book, so scholars who are not aware of Monahan's first volume would find some disturbing lacunae if the second volume is read alone.(For instance, Marsilius of Padua, who appears as a marginal figure in From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights, is featured prominently along with other fourteenth- century thinkers in the penultimate section of Consent, Coercion and Limit).Similarly, as Monahan intends to continue this series in a third volume "whose primary focus will be theories of policy that are recognizably 'scientific'" (p. 1 1) the cut-off date of 1600 is deceptive.Some important figures from the sixteenth century, Jean Bodin among them, are absent from this study.While the author's justification for doing so seems sound, their absence is unexpected given the tide's promise.From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights also lacks the sharp focus of the first volume.Where earlier Monahan kept to the history of parliamentary democracy, in this volume he attempts to cover a number of approaches.He has abandoned the chronological approach of Consent, Coercion and Limit, where he treated the parliamentary thinkers century by century.From Personal Duties Towards Personal Rights favours a multi-thematic treatment of the material.Topics including civic republicanism, constitutionalism and the Reformation are useful organizing principles for the chapters, though, as Monahan admits, there are awkward gaps left to fill, as evinced by the separate section devoted to the Spanish neo-scholasdcs such as Vitoria and Suarez while also attempting to integrate humanist Juan Luis Vives into the same analysisa less-than-successful proposition.Discussion of a few individual thinkers and their works constitutes the bulk of each section, after Monahan provides a broad context for that school of political thought.By arranging his material in thematic sections, Monahan categorizes the political thinkers into pigeonholes which are not

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it