MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2483416356 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.3276

Felix Arnold Edward Pirani

2016· article· en· W2483416356 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Robinson

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeneral relativityGraduate studentsClassicsArt historyHistorySociologyPhysicsMathematical physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Felix Arnold Edward Pirani, a prominent contributor to the post–World War II renaissance in research into general relativity, died in London on 31 December 2015 after a short illness.Felix Arnold Edward PiraniPPT|High resolutionFelix was born in London on 2 February 1928, the son of two concert musicians from Australia. Because of his father’s work, Felix and his family moved around for a time, and he attended schools in England, Australia, New Zealand, and eventually Canada, where they settled in 1941. He enrolled at the University of British Columbia at 14 and, after his family moved east, graduated from the University of Western Ontario with a BSc in physics and mathematics in 1948. In that year his first scientific paper, written in collaboration with his optics teacher, A. Willena Foster, was published in the American Journal of Physics.As a graduate student at the University of Toronto, Felix was introduced to general relativity by Leopold Infeld and Alfred Schild. On completing his MA in mathematics there in 1949, he accompanied Schild to Vancouver for Paul Dirac’s lectures on the quantization of Lagrangian field theories. They then moved to the Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie Mellon University), where Felix became Schild’s first doctoral student. Schild had realized that the techniques described by Dirac could be applied to general relativity; Felix’s thesis title was “On the quantization of the gravitational field of general relativity.” In 1951 Felix was awarded a DSc in applied mathematics. At Carnegie Tech he collaborated on two of the earliest papers on the canonical formalism of general relativity and attempts to quantize the theory, but he never again published on the topic.Felix obtained a National Research Council Canada postdoctoral fellowship to work with Hermann Bondi at Cambridge University. At Bondi’s suggestion, he enrolled for a PhD in applied mathematics. For a time he was an enthusiastic supporter of the steady-state model of the universe. In a 1955 paper, “On the energy-momentum tensor and the creation of matter in relativistic cosmology,” he coined the word “gravitino,” which would later be employed, with a quite different meaning, in supergravity theory. Felix’s work in general relativity and cosmology at Cambridge led to his 1956 thesis, titled “The relativistic basis of mechanics,” and a second doctorate.During 1954–55 Felix spent a year in Ireland as a postdoc at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, where he was influenced by geometer and relativist John Synge. There Felix commenced his most notable research, on the understanding of gravitational waves, and contributed to the removal of doubts, entertained even by Albert Einstein, about their physical reality. In his 1956 paper “On the physical significance of the Riemann tensor,” Felix explained how the tensor could be measured, and his ideas influenced subsequent work on gravitational-wave detectors.In 1955 Felix became a lecturer in mathematics at King’s College London, where he would remain for the rest of his academic career. There he joined Bondi, who had moved from Cambridge, and Clive Kilmister to form what became a leading relativity research group. At King’s, Felix continued to produce groundbreaking research. In a 1957 Physical Review paper, he wrote, “The investigation of gravitational radiation in general relativity theory is hampered by the lack of an invariant definition of that concept.” He then proposed an invariant definition that focused on the Riemann tensor and its measurability. That paper included a highly original application to gravitational radiation theory of the classification of conformal curvature tensors by Soviet mathematical physicist Aleksei Petrov. Felix’s further work on gravitational waves included a seminal study with Bondi and Ivor Robinson of plane gravitational waves, several widely read review articles, and his 1964 Brandeis Summer Institute lectures, “Introduction to Gravitational Radiation Theory.”Felix became a professor of rational mechanics in 1967. When Bondi left King’s, Felix took over leadership of the group and the supervision of numerous research students. A charismatic research supervisor and teacher, he had a lasting influence on his students.By 1970 he increasingly felt that some of the new research developments in general relativity were not physically well grounded. For decades he remained unconvinced about black holes and hoped they would lose plausibility; eventually he changed his mind. With his interest in general relativity waning, he turned to the study of soliton equations and applied differential geometry. He took early retirement in 1983 and became an emeritus professor and senior research fellow in the mathematics department.After retiring, Felix published, with Michael Crampin, a book on applicable differential geometry, and he collaborated with Bondi on two papers on gravitational waves. He also wrote and reviewed books for children and young adults. One of his main pursuits became making mosaics, some of which he exchanged in return for donations to charity. His leftish political commitment remained unabated, as did his warmth, generosity, and capacity for friendship.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,193
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,644

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1930,131

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetRelativity and Gravitational TheoryTravaux en français237 207