MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483416356 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.3276

Felix Arnold Edward Pirani

2016· article· en· W2483416356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral relativityGraduate studentsClassicsArt historyHistorySociologyPhysicsMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Felix Arnold Edward Pirani, a prominent contributor to the post–World War II renaissance in research into general relativity, died in London on 31 December 2015 after a short illness.Felix Arnold Edward PiraniPPT|High resolutionFelix was born in London on 2 February 1928, the son of two concert musicians from Australia. Because of his father’s work, Felix and his family moved around for a time, and he attended schools in England, Australia, New Zealand, and eventually Canada, where they settled in 1941. He enrolled at the University of British Columbia at 14 and, after his family moved east, graduated from the University of Western Ontario with a BSc in physics and mathematics in 1948. In that year his first scientific paper, written in collaboration with his optics teacher, A. Willena Foster, was published in the American Journal of Physics.As a graduate student at the University of Toronto, Felix was introduced to general relativity by Leopold Infeld and Alfred Schild. On completing his MA in mathematics there in 1949, he accompanied Schild to Vancouver for Paul Dirac’s lectures on the quantization of Lagrangian field theories. They then moved to the Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie Mellon University), where Felix became Schild’s first doctoral student. Schild had realized that the techniques described by Dirac could be applied to general relativity; Felix’s thesis title was “On the quantization of the gravitational field of general relativity.” In 1951 Felix was awarded a DSc in applied mathematics. At Carnegie Tech he collaborated on two of the earliest papers on the canonical formalism of general relativity and attempts to quantize the theory, but he never again published on the topic.Felix obtained a National Research Council Canada postdoctoral fellowship to work with Hermann Bondi at Cambridge University. At Bondi’s suggestion, he enrolled for a PhD in applied mathematics. For a time he was an enthusiastic supporter of the steady-state model of the universe. In a 1955 paper, “On the energy-momentum tensor and the creation of matter in relativistic cosmology,” he coined the word “gravitino,” which would later be employed, with a quite different meaning, in supergravity theory. Felix’s work in general relativity and cosmology at Cambridge led to his 1956 thesis, titled “The relativistic basis of mechanics,” and a second doctorate.During 1954–55 Felix spent a year in Ireland as a postdoc at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, where he was influenced by geometer and relativist John Synge. There Felix commenced his most notable research, on the understanding of gravitational waves, and contributed to the removal of doubts, entertained even by Albert Einstein, about their physical reality. In his 1956 paper “On the physical significance of the Riemann tensor,” Felix explained how the tensor could be measured, and his ideas influenced subsequent work on gravitational-wave detectors.In 1955 Felix became a lecturer in mathematics at King’s College London, where he would remain for the rest of his academic career. There he joined Bondi, who had moved from Cambridge, and Clive Kilmister to form what became a leading relativity research group. At King’s, Felix continued to produce groundbreaking research. In a 1957 Physical Review paper, he wrote, “The investigation of gravitational radiation in general relativity theory is hampered by the lack of an invariant definition of that concept.” He then proposed an invariant definition that focused on the Riemann tensor and its measurability. That paper included a highly original application to gravitational radiation theory of the classification of conformal curvature tensors by Soviet mathematical physicist Aleksei Petrov. Felix’s further work on gravitational waves included a seminal study with Bondi and Ivor Robinson of plane gravitational waves, several widely read review articles, and his 1964 Brandeis Summer Institute lectures, “Introduction to Gravitational Radiation Theory.”Felix became a professor of rational mechanics in 1967. When Bondi left King’s, Felix took over leadership of the group and the supervision of numerous research students. A charismatic research supervisor and teacher, he had a lasting influence on his students.By 1970 he increasingly felt that some of the new research developments in general relativity were not physically well grounded. For decades he remained unconvinced about black holes and hoped they would lose plausibility; eventually he changed his mind. With his interest in general relativity waning, he turned to the study of soliton equations and applied differential geometry. He took early retirement in 1983 and became an emeritus professor and senior research fellow in the mathematics department.After retiring, Felix published, with Michael Crampin, a book on applicable differential geometry, and he collaborated with Bondi on two papers on gravitational waves. He also wrote and reviewed books for children and young adults. One of his main pursuits became making mosaics, some of which he exchanged in return for donations to charity. His leftish political commitment remained unabated, as did his warmth, generosity, and capacity for friendship.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicRelativity and Gravitational TheoryFrench-language works237,207