Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis studies planning problems whose solution plans are program-like structures that contain branches and loops. Such problems are a generalization of classical and conditional planning, and usually involve infinitely many cases to be handled by a single plan. This form of planning is useful in a number of applications, but meanwhile challenging to analyze and solve. As a result, it is drawing increasing interest in the AI community. In this thesis, I will give a formal definition of planning with loops in the situation calculus framework, and propose a corresponding plan representation in the form of finite-state automata. It turns out that this definition is more general than a previous formalization that uses restricted programming structures for plans. For the verification of plans with loops, we study a property of planning problems called finite verifiability. Such problems have the property that for any candidate plan, only a finite number of cases need to be checked in order to conclude whether the plan is correct for all the infinitely many cases. I will identify several forms of finitely-verifiable classes of planning problems, including the so-called one-dimensional problems where an unknown and unbounded number of objects need independent processing. I will also show that this property is not universal, in that finite verifiability of less restricted problems would mean a solution to the Halting problem or an unresolved mathematical conjecture. For the generation of plans with loops, I will present a novel nondeterministic algorithm which essentially searches in the space of the AND/OR execution trees of an incremental partial plan on a finite set of example instances of the planning problem. Two different implementations of the algorithm are explored for search efficiency, namely, heuristic search and randomized search with restarts. In both cases, I will show that the resulting planner generates compact plans for a dozen benchmark problems, some of which are not solved by other existing approaches, to the best of our knowledge. Finally, I will present generalizations and applications of the framework proposed in this thesis that enables the analysis and solution of related planning problems recently proposed in the literature, namely, controller synthesis, service composition and planning programs. Notably, the latter two require possiblynon-terminating execution in a dynamic environment to provide services to coming requests. I will show a generic definition and planner whose instantiation accommodates and solves all the three example applications. Interestingly, the instantiations are competitive with, and sometimes even outperform, the original tailored approaches proposed in the literature.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».