MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502059287

Generation and verification of plans with loops

2012· dissertation· en· W2502059287 on OpenAlexaff
Hector J. Levesque, Yuxiao Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNondeterministic algorithmProperty (philosophy)Plan (archaeology)Computer scienceFinite-state machineGeneralizationState (computer science)Representation (politics)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis studies planning problems whose solution plans are program-like structures that contain branches and loops. Such problems are a generalization of classical and conditional planning, and usually involve infinitely many cases to be handled by a single plan. This form of planning is useful in a number of applications, but meanwhile challenging to analyze and solve. As a result, it is drawing increasing interest in the AI community. In this thesis, I will give a formal definition of planning with loops in the situation calculus framework, and propose a corresponding plan representation in the form of finite-state automata. It turns out that this definition is more general than a previous formalization that uses restricted programming structures for plans. For the verification of plans with loops, we study a property of planning problems called finite verifiability. Such problems have the property that for any candidate plan, only a finite number of cases need to be checked in order to conclude whether the plan is correct for all the infinitely many cases. I will identify several forms of finitely-verifiable classes of planning problems, including the so-called one-dimensional problems where an unknown and unbounded number of objects need independent processing. I will also show that this property is not universal, in that finite verifiability of less restricted problems would mean a solution to the Halting problem or an unresolved mathematical conjecture. For the generation of plans with loops, I will present a novel nondeterministic algorithm which essentially searches in the space of the AND/OR execution trees of an incremental partial plan on a finite set of example instances of the planning problem. Two different implementations of the algorithm are explored for search efficiency, namely, heuristic search and randomized search with restarts. In both cases, I will show that the resulting planner generates compact plans for a dozen benchmark problems, some of which are not solved by other existing approaches, to the best of our knowledge. Finally, I will present generalizations and applications of the framework proposed in this thesis that enables the analysis and solution of related planning problems recently proposed in the literature, namely, controller synthesis, service composition and planning programs. Notably, the latter two require possiblynon-terminating execution in a dynamic environment to provide services to coming requests. I will show a generic definition and planner whose instantiation accommodates and solves all the three example applications. Interestingly, the instantiations are competitive with, and sometimes even outperform, the original tailored approaches proposed in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeFrench-language works237,207