Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Visual Disturbance among Diabetic Patient in Outpatient Clinic in Elmek Nimer University Hospital 2014- Sudan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This descriptive cross-sectional community based was conducted to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of visual disturbance among diabetic patient in outpatient clinic in Elmek nimer hospital, in the period from April -December 2014. In this study 90 diabetic patients were included. They are selected by use probability method of sampling (simple random sampling). Data was collected by two tools (Selfadministered questionnaire, snellen test chart).The present study reveal that more than two third of study group (68.9%, 66.7%) were female and their age more than 45years, respectively. More than quarters of them (28.9%) are primary school. the highly significant statistical relation had been found between the level of education and diabetes follow up (p-value 0.05). The collective evidence from this study showed that (64.4 %) of study population had Type 2 of diabetes. More than two third of patients (71.1%) their duration of diabetes between 5-10 years. The highly proportion (53.3%) of study population use Oral hypoglycemic agent. In contrast to more than quarter (26.5%) of them had hypertension. Therefore important that effort should made using the media to create diabetic awareness in rural areas with less health services and emphasize the importance of dietary program .Less than two third (61.8%) of study population were performing eye examination by physician. Majority (71.1%) of study population experience of visual disturbance recently. This study explains that less than quarter (24.4%, 22.2%) of study population had developed retinopathy and cataract, respectively. It has been found from this study (25.6%) of study population had mild vision loss with eye equity 6/18 and only (13.3%) had profound vision loss.Finally, the study recommend that, Locally educational programmes are highly needed to reduce the risk of visual impairment and blindness among diabetics and Systematic screening for diabetic retinal disease should be provided for all people with diabetes and should be screened at least annually.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».