MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508152223 · doi:10.9790/1959-0504020612

Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Visual Disturbance among Diabetic Patient in Outpatient Clinic in Elmek Nimer University Hospital 2014- Sudan

2016· article· en· W2508152223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Jebreldar Abuanja, Samah Mustafa Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueIOSR Journal of Nursing and health Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusPopulationOutpatient clinicSimple random sampleQuarter (Canadian coin)Diabetic retinopathyPopulation studyPediatricsFamily medicineDemographyOptometryEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This descriptive cross-sectional community based was conducted to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of visual disturbance among diabetic patient in outpatient clinic in Elmek nimer hospital, in the period from April -December 2014. In this study 90 diabetic patients were included. They are selected by use probability method of sampling (simple random sampling). Data was collected by two tools (Selfadministered questionnaire, snellen test chart).The present study reveal that more than two third of study group (68.9%, 66.7%) were female and their age more than 45years, respectively. More than quarters of them (28.9%) are primary school. the highly significant statistical relation had been found between the level of education and diabetes follow up (p-value 0.05). The collective evidence from this study showed that (64.4 %) of study population had Type 2 of diabetes. More than two third of patients (71.1%) their duration of diabetes between 5-10 years. The highly proportion (53.3%) of study population use Oral hypoglycemic agent. In contrast to more than quarter (26.5%) of them had hypertension. Therefore important that effort should made using the media to create diabetic awareness in rural areas with less health services and emphasize the importance of dietary program .Less than two third (61.8%) of study population were performing eye examination by physician. Majority (71.1%) of study population experience of visual disturbance recently. This study explains that less than quarter (24.4%, 22.2%) of study population had developed retinopathy and cataract, respectively. It has been found from this study (25.6%) of study population had mild vision loss with eye equity 6/18 and only (13.3%) had profound vision loss.Finally, the study recommend that, Locally educational programmes are highly needed to reduce the risk of visual impairment and blindness among diabetics and Systematic screening for diabetic retinal disease should be provided for all people with diabetes and should be screened at least annually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOSR Journal of Nursing and health ScienceSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207