Final Results from a Phase 4 Open-Label 3-Year Study Evaluating Changes in Bone Marrow (Bm) Morphology in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Patients (Pts) Receiving the Thrombopoietin Mimetic Romiplostim
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Normal bm may contain reticulin, which is of unknown clinical relevance. An analysis of romiplostim ITP trials as of 2011 showed 17 reticulin cases and one collagen case; however, biopsies were not performed systematically. Reported here are final results from a prospective 3-year (y) study evaluating bm biopsies for reticulin and collagen before and after treatment with romiplostim in adult ITP pts. Methods: Eligible ITP pts had platelets <50x109/L, received ≥1 prior ITP therapy, and had no collagen in baseline bm biopsies (before romiplostim). Biopsies were scheduled after 1 (Cohort 1), 2 (Cohort 2), or 3 (Cohort 3) y of romiplostim, dosed to maintain platelets at 50–200x109/L; all cohorts could receive 3 y of romiplostim. Biopsies were also performed if pts discontinued early or failed to achieve/maintain a response to romiplostim (platelets ≤20x109/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the max dose of 10 µg/kg). Reticulin and collagen were evaluated using the modified Bauermeister scale (0 no reticulin; 1 occasional fine fibers/foci of fine fiber network; 2 fine fiber network; 3 diffuse fiber network, scattered coarse fibers; 4 diffuse coarse fiber network, areas of collagenization). Collagen was detected by trichrome staining and reticulin by silver staining. Two hematopathologists at a central laboratory read all the samples; an independent panel reviewed grading discrepancies. Results: All pts received romiplostim and had evaluable baseline bm biopsies. Of the 50 pts in Cohort 1 [54% female, mean age 55.5 y, range 20–86 y, mean (SD) dose 4.0 (2.8) µg/kg], 39 had post-baseline bm biopsies (Table). No pts with evaluable results developed collagen or had an increase ≥2 grades from baseline in reticulin. Of the 50 pts in Cohort 2 [76% female, mean age 48.6 y, range 19–83 y, mean (SD) dose 4.3 (3.1) µg/kg], 40 had post-baseline bm biopsies. There was no evidence of collagen; 2 pts had a 2-grade increase in reticulin. Of the 69 pts in Cohort 3 [71% female, mean age 46.6 y, range 18-81 y, mean (SD) dose 4.1 (2.9) µg/kg], 58 had post-baseline bm biopsies; 7 pts had a 2-grade increase in modified Bauermeister score, with 2 of the 7 showing collagen. Of those 2, 1 had no evidence of collagen on follow-up biopsy 12 weeks later; the other refused a follow-up biopsy. The safety profile was similar to that in past trials. In Cohort 1, 4 pts died; causes were fungal sepsis in a pt with longstanding corticosteroid use, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary hemorrhage in a pt with pulmonary thrombosis treated with acenocoumarol, and subdural hematoma that occurred after the pt fell and sustained a head injury. In Cohort 2, 2 pts died; causes were acute renal failure in a pt with a history of chronic renal insufficiency and suicide. In Cohort 3, 1 pt died of multiple thromboses of microcirculation and failure of the heart, kidneys, and lungs. No deaths were attributed to romiplostim. One pt in Cohort 3 tested positive for neutralizing antibodies (Ab) to romiplostim at Week 30 through the Year 1 visit, but was Ab negative on a subsequent test; the last romiplostim dose was at Week 36, but the pt maintained platelet response throughout. Summary/Conclusion: An increase in modified Bauermeister score by ≥2 grades occurred in 9 of 131 pts (6.9%) treated with romiplostim; 7 had increased reticulin only and 2 also had collagen. The low incidence of both collagen and increased reticulin is consistent with results of past romiplostim studies. Table Biopsy Results TableCohort 1 N = 50Cohort 2 N = 50Cohort 3 N = 69Bone marrow biopsies after receiving romiplostim1394058Biopsies evaluable for collagen (trichrome stain)2353958Positive for collagen0025Duration-adjusted rate3, 95% CI0 (0, 8.8)0 (0, 4.0)1.3 (0.2, 4.6)Biopsies evaluable for reticulin (silver stain)2343958Increase in reticulin by ≥2 grades or to grade 402476Duration-adjusted rate3, 95% CI0 (0, 10.0)2.7 (0.3, 9.6)4.5 (1.8, 9.2) 1 3 pts in cohort 1, 3 in cohort 2, and 10 in cohort 3 had biopsies at end of treatment due to early discontinuation. 2 Trichrome and silver staining results could not be obtained for all biopsies due to inadequate samples. 3 Duration-adjusted, per 100 pt-y 4 1 case: grade 0 to 2; 1 case: grade 1 to 3 5 1 case: grade 4 after 25 weeks in a pt with atypical ITP, no evidence of collagen on follow-up biopsy 12 weeks later; 1 case: grade 4 at end of treatment, pt refused follow-up biopsy 6 2 cases: collagen (as above in 5); 2 cases: grade 0 to 2; 3 cases: grade 1 to 3 Disclosures Janssens: Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rodeghiero:GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Suppremol: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Chong:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Pabinger:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cervinek:Alexion: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Wang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lopez:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».