Final Results from a Phase 4 Open-Label 3-Year Study Evaluating Changes in Bone Marrow (Bm) Morphology in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Patients (Pts) Receiving the Thrombopoietin Mimetic Romiplostim
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Normal bm may contain reticulin, which is of unknown clinical relevance. An analysis of romiplostim ITP trials as of 2011 showed 17 reticulin cases and one collagen case; however, biopsies were not performed systematically. Reported here are final results from a prospective 3-year (y) study evaluating bm biopsies for reticulin and collagen before and after treatment with romiplostim in adult ITP pts. Methods: Eligible ITP pts had platelets <50x109/L, received ≥1 prior ITP therapy, and had no collagen in baseline bm biopsies (before romiplostim). Biopsies were scheduled after 1 (Cohort 1), 2 (Cohort 2), or 3 (Cohort 3) y of romiplostim, dosed to maintain platelets at 50–200x109/L; all cohorts could receive 3 y of romiplostim. Biopsies were also performed if pts discontinued early or failed to achieve/maintain a response to romiplostim (platelets ≤20x109/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the max dose of 10 µg/kg). Reticulin and collagen were evaluated using the modified Bauermeister scale (0 no reticulin; 1 occasional fine fibers/foci of fine fiber network; 2 fine fiber network; 3 diffuse fiber network, scattered coarse fibers; 4 diffuse coarse fiber network, areas of collagenization). Collagen was detected by trichrome staining and reticulin by silver staining. Two hematopathologists at a central laboratory read all the samples; an independent panel reviewed grading discrepancies. Results: All pts received romiplostim and had evaluable baseline bm biopsies. Of the 50 pts in Cohort 1 [54% female, mean age 55.5 y, range 20–86 y, mean (SD) dose 4.0 (2.8) µg/kg], 39 had post-baseline bm biopsies (Table). No pts with evaluable results developed collagen or had an increase ≥2 grades from baseline in reticulin. Of the 50 pts in Cohort 2 [76% female, mean age 48.6 y, range 19–83 y, mean (SD) dose 4.3 (3.1) µg/kg], 40 had post-baseline bm biopsies. There was no evidence of collagen; 2 pts had a 2-grade increase in reticulin. Of the 69 pts in Cohort 3 [71% female, mean age 46.6 y, range 18-81 y, mean (SD) dose 4.1 (2.9) µg/kg], 58 had post-baseline bm biopsies; 7 pts had a 2-grade increase in modified Bauermeister score, with 2 of the 7 showing collagen. Of those 2, 1 had no evidence of collagen on follow-up biopsy 12 weeks later; the other refused a follow-up biopsy. The safety profile was similar to that in past trials. In Cohort 1, 4 pts died; causes were fungal sepsis in a pt with longstanding corticosteroid use, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary hemorrhage in a pt with pulmonary thrombosis treated with acenocoumarol, and subdural hematoma that occurred after the pt fell and sustained a head injury. In Cohort 2, 2 pts died; causes were acute renal failure in a pt with a history of chronic renal insufficiency and suicide. In Cohort 3, 1 pt died of multiple thromboses of microcirculation and failure of the heart, kidneys, and lungs. No deaths were attributed to romiplostim. One pt in Cohort 3 tested positive for neutralizing antibodies (Ab) to romiplostim at Week 30 through the Year 1 visit, but was Ab negative on a subsequent test; the last romiplostim dose was at Week 36, but the pt maintained platelet response throughout. Summary/Conclusion: An increase in modified Bauermeister score by ≥2 grades occurred in 9 of 131 pts (6.9%) treated with romiplostim; 7 had increased reticulin only and 2 also had collagen. The low incidence of both collagen and increased reticulin is consistent with results of past romiplostim studies. Table Biopsy Results TableCohort 1 N = 50Cohort 2 N = 50Cohort 3 N = 69Bone marrow biopsies after receiving romiplostim1394058Biopsies evaluable for collagen (trichrome stain)2353958Positive for collagen0025Duration-adjusted rate3, 95% CI0 (0, 8.8)0 (0, 4.0)1.3 (0.2, 4.6)Biopsies evaluable for reticulin (silver stain)2343958Increase in reticulin by ≥2 grades or to grade 402476Duration-adjusted rate3, 95% CI0 (0, 10.0)2.7 (0.3, 9.6)4.5 (1.8, 9.2) 1 3 pts in cohort 1, 3 in cohort 2, and 10 in cohort 3 had biopsies at end of treatment due to early discontinuation. 2 Trichrome and silver staining results could not be obtained for all biopsies due to inadequate samples. 3 Duration-adjusted, per 100 pt-y 4 1 case: grade 0 to 2; 1 case: grade 1 to 3 5 1 case: grade 4 after 25 weeks in a pt with atypical ITP, no evidence of collagen on follow-up biopsy 12 weeks later; 1 case: grade 4 at end of treatment, pt refused follow-up biopsy 6 2 cases: collagen (as above in 5); 2 cases: grade 0 to 2; 3 cases: grade 1 to 3 Disclosures Janssens: Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rodeghiero:GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Suppremol: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Chong:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Pabinger:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cervinek:Alexion: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Wang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lopez:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".