MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2511851904 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.2520.2520

Population Based Analysis of Outcomes of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) Suggests a Treatment Strategy Including Intensive Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Provides a Survival Advantage for Patients <65 Years of Age

2014· article· en· W2511851904 sur OpenAlexaffabout
J Graczyk, Sunita Ghosh, Neil Chua, Douglas A. Stewart, Carolyn Owen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineThioTEPAPrimary central nervous system lymphomaBusulfanCyclophosphamideAutologous stem-cell transplantationPopulationInternal medicineSurgeryCytarabineTransplantationOncologyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNL) is rare, associated with poor outcomes, and lacks widely accepted management guidelines. Prior to 2011, one Alberta tertiary cancer centre consolidated high dose methotrexate (HDM)-based induction with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), while the other utilized high dose cytarabine (HDAC) and then high dose therapy (HDT) with thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), especially for patients <65 years of age. Since November 2011, both tertiary Alberta centres followed the same protocol incorporating high dose thiotepa and busulfan (without cyclophosphamide) and ASCT, but avoided WBRT. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive Alberta patients diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative PCNSL from 01/98-12/13 to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes of treatment approaches used during this period. Results: Characteristics of the identified 107 PCNSL patients include: median age 61 years (33-86), 37% aged 65 years or older, 34% ECOG 3-4 performance status, 61% deep brain involvement, 22% elevated LDH, 9% immune suppressed. Overall, 60% of patients received HDM-based therapy, 29% received HDT and ASCT as part of primary therapy and 35% received WBRT as part of primary therapy (Figure 1). Of patients receiving HDM-based therapy, the median number of cycles of MTX was 4 with 45% of these patients receiving a dose of HDM ≥ 4g/m2. Where given, the median number of cycles of HDAC ≥ 2g/m2 was 2. The median follow up for surviving patients is 60.7 months (4.4 – 190.5 months). For all patients, 5 year overall survival (OS) was significantly improved with the use of HDT-ASCT (57.8% overall, 52.6% in first remission (PR1) and 66.7% at relapse) compared with HDM +/- WBRT (36.7%) or WBRT alone (15.5%) (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Similarly, in all patients 5 year event free survival (EFS) was significantly improved with the use of HDT-ASCT in first remission (49.9%), compared with HDM-based therapy (29.9%) or WBRT alone (15.6%) (p<0.001). This was most notable in patients age < 65 years (N=67), where HDT-ASCT demonstrated improved 5 year OS (63.6% overall, 60.4% in PR1, 66.7% at relapse) compared with HDM-based therapy (34.5%) or WBRT alone (20.8%) (p<0.001) and in which HDT-ASCT in first remission showed superior 5 year EFS (57.5%) over combination HDM-based therapy (30.5%) and isolated WBRT (20.8%) (p<0.001). However, none of the 3 patients treated with HDT-ASCT over age 65 years achieved 5 year OS. This compares poorly with the 5 year OS rates of 60% for HDM-based therapy or 11.8% for WBRT alone in patients age ≥ 65 years (p 0.006). Factors independently associated with improved OS in multivariate analysis were: Age < 65y, ECOG 0-2, HDM, WBRT, HDT-ASCT. Of these factors, age <65 and HDT-ASCT were the only factors predictive of improved EFS. Thus far, 14 patients have been treated using the uniform Alberta treatment approach that was established in November 2011. These 14 patients achieved a 2 year EFS rate of 64.6% compared to the 45.1% 2 year EFS seen in the 93 historical patients treated in Alberta from 1998-2011. Of patients receiving HDT-ASCT in first remission, treatment related grade 3-4 toxicities were seen in 5 patients (16%) and treatment related mortality was 9.7% (3 infections) with all deaths occurring prior to 2011. The use of WBRT in combination with HDM and/or HDT-ASCT resulted in marked increases in neurotoxicity compared to treatments that avoided WBRT (OR 3.8, p 0.0093). Conclusion: HDT-ASCT is an effective first remission consolidation treatment for PCNSL and could be considered for all fit patients age < 65 years. Patients age ≥ 65 years with PCNSL should be offered HDM-based therapy without HDT-ASCT. WBRT also confers an OS advantage relative to palliation, but is associated with a significant increased risk of neurotoxicity with implications for impaired quality of life. Figure 1 First-line treatment received by patients with PCNSL diagnosed in Alberta from 1998-2013 Figure 1. First-line treatment received by patients with PCNSL diagnosed in Alberta from 1998-2013 Figure 2 Overall survival of all PCNSL patients diagnosed 1998-2013 in Alberta Figure 2. Overall survival of all PCNSL patients diagnosed 1998-2013 in Alberta Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207