MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Population Based Analysis of Outcomes of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) Suggests a Treatment Strategy Including Intensive Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Provides a Survival Advantage for Patients <65 Years of Age

2014· article· en· W2511851904 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Graczyk, Sunita Ghosh, Neil Chua, Douglas A. Stewart, Carolyn Owen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThioTEPAPrimary central nervous system lymphomaBusulfanCyclophosphamideAutologous stem-cell transplantationPopulationInternal medicineSurgeryCytarabineTransplantationOncologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNL) is rare, associated with poor outcomes, and lacks widely accepted management guidelines. Prior to 2011, one Alberta tertiary cancer centre consolidated high dose methotrexate (HDM)-based induction with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), while the other utilized high dose cytarabine (HDAC) and then high dose therapy (HDT) with thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), especially for patients <65 years of age. Since November 2011, both tertiary Alberta centres followed the same protocol incorporating high dose thiotepa and busulfan (without cyclophosphamide) and ASCT, but avoided WBRT. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive Alberta patients diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative PCNSL from 01/98-12/13 to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes of treatment approaches used during this period. Results: Characteristics of the identified 107 PCNSL patients include: median age 61 years (33-86), 37% aged 65 years or older, 34% ECOG 3-4 performance status, 61% deep brain involvement, 22% elevated LDH, 9% immune suppressed. Overall, 60% of patients received HDM-based therapy, 29% received HDT and ASCT as part of primary therapy and 35% received WBRT as part of primary therapy (Figure 1). Of patients receiving HDM-based therapy, the median number of cycles of MTX was 4 with 45% of these patients receiving a dose of HDM ≥ 4g/m2. Where given, the median number of cycles of HDAC ≥ 2g/m2 was 2. The median follow up for surviving patients is 60.7 months (4.4 – 190.5 months). For all patients, 5 year overall survival (OS) was significantly improved with the use of HDT-ASCT (57.8% overall, 52.6% in first remission (PR1) and 66.7% at relapse) compared with HDM +/- WBRT (36.7%) or WBRT alone (15.5%) (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Similarly, in all patients 5 year event free survival (EFS) was significantly improved with the use of HDT-ASCT in first remission (49.9%), compared with HDM-based therapy (29.9%) or WBRT alone (15.6%) (p<0.001). This was most notable in patients age < 65 years (N=67), where HDT-ASCT demonstrated improved 5 year OS (63.6% overall, 60.4% in PR1, 66.7% at relapse) compared with HDM-based therapy (34.5%) or WBRT alone (20.8%) (p<0.001) and in which HDT-ASCT in first remission showed superior 5 year EFS (57.5%) over combination HDM-based therapy (30.5%) and isolated WBRT (20.8%) (p<0.001). However, none of the 3 patients treated with HDT-ASCT over age 65 years achieved 5 year OS. This compares poorly with the 5 year OS rates of 60% for HDM-based therapy or 11.8% for WBRT alone in patients age ≥ 65 years (p 0.006). Factors independently associated with improved OS in multivariate analysis were: Age < 65y, ECOG 0-2, HDM, WBRT, HDT-ASCT. Of these factors, age <65 and HDT-ASCT were the only factors predictive of improved EFS. Thus far, 14 patients have been treated using the uniform Alberta treatment approach that was established in November 2011. These 14 patients achieved a 2 year EFS rate of 64.6% compared to the 45.1% 2 year EFS seen in the 93 historical patients treated in Alberta from 1998-2011. Of patients receiving HDT-ASCT in first remission, treatment related grade 3-4 toxicities were seen in 5 patients (16%) and treatment related mortality was 9.7% (3 infections) with all deaths occurring prior to 2011. The use of WBRT in combination with HDM and/or HDT-ASCT resulted in marked increases in neurotoxicity compared to treatments that avoided WBRT (OR 3.8, p 0.0093). Conclusion: HDT-ASCT is an effective first remission consolidation treatment for PCNSL and could be considered for all fit patients age < 65 years. Patients age ≥ 65 years with PCNSL should be offered HDM-based therapy without HDT-ASCT. WBRT also confers an OS advantage relative to palliation, but is associated with a significant increased risk of neurotoxicity with implications for impaired quality of life. Figure 1 First-line treatment received by patients with PCNSL diagnosed in Alberta from 1998-2013 Figure 1. First-line treatment received by patients with PCNSL diagnosed in Alberta from 1998-2013 Figure 2 Overall survival of all PCNSL patients diagnosed 1998-2013 in Alberta Figure 2. Overall survival of all PCNSL patients diagnosed 1998-2013 in Alberta Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207