Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper concerns H. G. Underwood(1859-1916) and O. R. Avison(1860-1956) to prove the religious identity by analyzing their writings in terms of that they were very influential missionaries at the early Korean Church History. Underwood, one of the first two clerical Protestant missionaries sent to Korea, was born to a pious family that attended a Congregational Church in England. Immediately after he emigrated to America at the age of twelve, he became a member of the Dutch Reformed Church in America until he became a missionary at the age of twenty-five. However, he transferred his membership to the Presbyterian Church in order to work in Korea. His writings indicate that his belief of the gospel was that of an all-round gospel. He tried to put all the parts of life under the sovereignty of God, to unite them in Jesus, and to unite himself as well with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ by his ardent commitment to the task. Avison, the medical missionary who founded Severance Hospital in Seoul, immigrated from England to Canada at the age of six and acquired his progressive disposition and humane sensibility under the influence of his father. His faith, which grew strong in the Methodist Church made him dedicate his life to foreign mission, and in order to be sent to Korea he transferred to the Presbyterian Church. He advocated the union of Methodism and Presbyterianism, and the scientific, rational, modern, and optimistic faith. His endeavors, however, were merely to clear a runway with modernism and development of science to conserve the old faith. Avison differed in his partial acceptance of evolution from Underwood who refused it, but Avison shared some similarities with Underwood in his insistence that churches should enhance their social influence by developing all three aspects of human beings togethermind, body, and spirit. Both men showed individuals, churches, societies, states, and international relationships a directivity of Union and development according to their religious identities with the idea of an all-encompassing gospel and a total self.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».