MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2523237690 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.116.116

Phase 1/1b Study of RG7388, a Potent MDM2 Antagonist, in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients (Pts)

2014· article· en· W2523237690 sur OpenAlexaff
Karen Yee, Giovanni Martinelli, Norbert Vey, Michael Dickinson, Karen Seiter, Sarit Assouline, Mark W. Drummond, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Margaret Kasner, Je‐Hwan Lee, Kevin R. Kelly, Steven Blotner, Brian Higgins, Steven A. Middleton, Gwen Nichols, Gong Chen, Judy Zhong, William E. Pierceall, Jianguo Zhi, Lin-Chi Chen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyRefractory (planetary science)PharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsAdverse effectCytarabinePharmacologyLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: RG7388 is a new, potent, oral, nutlin-class MDM2 antagonist. This trial evaluated its use in AML to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics and clinical responses. Methods: This multicenter, open-label phase 1/1b dose escalation (DE) study evaluated RG7388 as monotherapy (daily ´ 5 d q28d) (Part 1 DE) and in combination with cytarabine (ara-C 1 g/m2 IV x 6 d q28d) (Part 2 DE). Extensions (Ex) were initiated at the RP2D. Part 1Ex (RG7388) included pts > 70 y or > 60 y with comorbidities. Part 2Ex pts (RG7388 ± ara-C) had relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, ≤ 2 regimens and no antecedent hematologic disorders (AHD) or transplant (ASCT). Blood and marrow analyses included PK, TP53 mutations (mt) by AmpliChip, serum MIC-1 and MDM2gene expression. Results: To date, 86 pts have been treated. DE is complete, Part 1Ex was discontinued after 9 pts and 34 of 40 planned pts are enrolled in Part 2Ex. One DLT of prolonged myelosuppression was reported. RP2D is 1200 mg/d (600 mg bid) x 5 d q28d for both mono- and combination therapy due to diarrhea not formally a DLT but felt to be dose-limiting. The most common adverse events were GI (diarrhea reported by > 85% of pts) or infection-related (> 70% of pts). Twenty pts received monotherapy during Part 1 DE at 400 (n = 2), 800 (n = 6) and 1600 mg (n = 12) daily x 5 d. Median age was 68.5 y (range 28-83 y), median prior therapies = 2 (range 0-4), 1 pt had ASCT and 8 had AHD. Four pts died in the first 30 days. Five pts achieved either a CR (n = 2) or CRi/MLFS (n = 3). In Part 1Ex, 9 pts were treated with RG7388 at the RP2D. Median age was 75 y (range 66-83), 8 pts had AHD (6 prior hypomethylators, 3 pts lower intensity therapy) and 1 had prior solid tumor. Best responses reported were 1 CRi/MLFS, 1 PR, 1HI, 3 PD. Three pts died in the first 30 days. Further enrollment in this arm was discontinued as induction of prolonged myelosuppression increased the risks of infection and early deaths. Combination treatment with lower RG7388 doses may be better tolerated in this fragile elderly population. Twenty-three pts were enrolled in Part 2 DE (RG7388 + ara-C) at daily doses of 400 (n = 10), 800 (n = 7), and 1200 mg (n = 6); median age 64 y (range 32-76); median prior therapies = 1.5 (range 0-5); prior ASCT 2; AHD 4; 5 had prior malignancies. Four pts died in the first 30 days. Six relapsed AML pts achieved CRs (4 received prior ara-C and 2 had prior hypomethylators). To date, 34 of 40 planned pts with R/R AML have been enrolled to Part 2Ex (RG7388 ± ara-C); 23 pts have responses reported, with 4 CRs, 1 CRi, 1 PR, 1 HI, 16 PD. Three pts died in the first 30 days. T1/2 is ≈ 1 d, irrespective of age, concomitant azoles or ara-C. Bone marrow levels are ≈ 70% of plasma drug levels at steady state. CRs were seen in diverse pts, including varied risk groups, prior AHD, therapy-related AML (t-AML), p53 mt, R/R and de novo AML. All pts who achieved a CR during DE were relapse free for > 60 d. One pt on monotherapy and 2 on combination therapy remained relapse free for > 400 d and > 200 d from start of study, respectively. A potential predictive gene expression signature correlated with RG7388 therapy (AUC = 0.73, p = 0.021). Conclusions: We report the Ph1/1b PK, safety and clinical activity of a new, potent MDM2 antagonist in AML. CRs occur rapidly and are durable (> 60 d) in elderly AML pts with RG7388 monotherapy and in R/R pts with combination therapy. Table Patient characteristics by response to treatment Part 1 DE (N = 20) 16 responses Best response 2 CR; 3CRi/MLFS 3 PR 4 HI 4 PD TP53 status WT WT 1 MT, 3 WT 1 V ELN* AHD(responders) 4 I, 1 A 3 (MDS, MF, CMML) 3 I 2 (MDS, CMML) Part 1Ex (N = 9) 6 responses Best response 1 CRi/MLFS 0 PR 2 HI 3 PD TP53 status WT WT, MT 2 WT, 1 U ELN* AHD(responders) I ET Part 2 DE (N = 23) 20 responses Best response 6 CR 2 PR 2 HI 10 PD TP53 status 1 MT WT WT 1 MT, 1 V ELN* AHD(responders) 1 F, 3 I, 2 A 1 t-AML 1 I, 1 A Part 2Ex (N = 34) 23 responses Best response 4 CR; 1 CRi/MLFS 1 PR 1 HI 16 PD TP53 status 4 WT, 1 U WT WT 1 MT, 5 WT, 10 U ELN*(responders) 1 F, 3 I, 1 A A CR, complete remission; CRi, complete remission with incomplete recovery; HI, hematologic improvement; MLFS, morphologic leukemia-free state; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; WT, wild type; V, splice variant; U, unknown/pending; AHD, includes myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), essential thrombocythemia (ET), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), myelofibrosis(MF) *ELN: Risk by European Leukemia Net: favorable (F), Intermediate I and II (I), or adverse (A) Disclosures Yee: Roche: Research Funding. Martinelli:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Vey:Roche: Honoraria. Assouline:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Drummond:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Blotner:Roche: Employment. Higgins:Roche: Employment. Middleton:Roche: Employment. Nichols:Roche: Employment. Chen:Roche: Employment. Zhong:Roche: Employment. Pierceall:Roche: Employment. Zhi:Roche: Employment. Chen:Roche: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,474
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations83
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207