MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W25246592 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1401166111

Sexual attitudes among Hispanic students at a border university: gender differences and failure to support Buss's jealousy theory

2005· article· en· W25246592 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Mark L. Dantzker, Russell Eisenman

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésJealousyPsychologyEthnic groupEvolutionary psychologyPermissiveSocial psychologyPerspective (graphical)Developmental psychologyScale (ratio)Sexual intercourseDemographySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Sexual attitudes were studied in 126 university students, at a Hispanic-serving university in the Rio Grande Valley, in Texas, near the Mexican border. Males and females rated their level of agreement to 38 items on a 1-to-5 scale, in a revision of a previously used sexual attitudes scale. For the most part, these students agreed with one another, but there were some important differences, with males being more permissive than females on some items. Both males and females reported that they would be jealous if their partner had sexual intercourse with someone else, and if their partner got emotionally involved with someone else. For the sexual intercourse item, females were significantly more jealous. These findings contradict Buss's evolutionary psychology theory of jealousy (Buss, 2000). We present possible explanations for the findings. Introduction Researchers have looked at sexual attitudes or behavior in racial and ethnic minorities (Airhihenbuwa, DiClemente, Wingood, & Lowe, 1992; Dantzker & Eisenman, 2003; Day, 1992; Eisenman & Dantzker, 2004; Erkut, Szalacha, Coil, & Alarcon, 2000; Fierros-Gonzalez & Brown, 2002; Flores, 1992; Pesa & Mathews, 2000). Minority people have to judge things while drawing on emotions and information from at least two perspectives, the majority culture and their own culture, while the majority person may only have to employ one perspective. Another important individual difference is gender: differences between males and females. Gender differences would seem to reflect a variety of cultural, biological, and social influences. In the present study, we are interested in the sexual attitudes of male and female college students at a university near the Mexican border. We use the term Hispanic because that is the most popular term used here. In other parts of the United States, Latino is considered more acceptable and Hispanic may even be seen as unacceptable. The University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA) has the second largest population of students in the nation (second only to Florida International University, in Miami), and 88% of the students attending UTPA are Hispanic. Most of the students at UTPA are bilingual, at least to some degree. Most live in the Rio Grande Valley area of the United States, although a few live in Mexico, and commute to classes. UTPA is part of the University of Texas system, and is the school in that system designated to be the system's number one Hispanic-serving institution. That, and its location near the Mexican border, and in the Rio Grande Valley region, helps explain why UTPA has the largest number of Mexican American students of any university in the nation. Florida International University, in Miami, has a large Cuban student body. Evolutionary Psychology An excellent perspective for understanding biological matters is evolutionary psychology theory. Evolution is the unifying theory in biology. Evolution has also come to be very important for the field of psychology, and may possibly be the number one theory today in psychology, having gained much recent popularity in the field. From an evolutionary psychology standpoint, men and women have different needs, as they try to maximize the survival of themselves and of their offspring into future generations. For men, the optimal strategy to insure their genes going into future generations is to impregnate as many women as possible, leading to a permissive attitude toward sex. Also, men should seek out partners who have youth, health and beauty. Women, on the other hand, get pregnant, and could not effectively employ the male strategy. Their passing on their genes to future generations is best assured by finding a male companion who possesses status and money, and who will invest in taking care of her and her offspring. Thus, women should be less permissive about sex than men, and should be more selective in who they wish to have sexual relations with. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorTravaux en français237 207