MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25246592 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1401166111

Sexual attitudes among Hispanic students at a border university: gender differences and failure to support Buss's jealousy theory

2005· article· en· W25246592 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mark L. Dantzker, Russell Eisenman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsJealousyPsychologyEthnic groupEvolutionary psychologyPermissiveSocial psychologyPerspective (graphical)Developmental psychologyScale (ratio)Sexual intercourseDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sexual attitudes were studied in 126 university students, at a Hispanic-serving university in the Rio Grande Valley, in Texas, near the Mexican border. Males and females rated their level of agreement to 38 items on a 1-to-5 scale, in a revision of a previously used sexual attitudes scale. For the most part, these students agreed with one another, but there were some important differences, with males being more permissive than females on some items. Both males and females reported that they would be jealous if their partner had sexual intercourse with someone else, and if their partner got emotionally involved with someone else. For the sexual intercourse item, females were significantly more jealous. These findings contradict Buss's evolutionary psychology theory of jealousy (Buss, 2000). We present possible explanations for the findings. Introduction Researchers have looked at sexual attitudes or behavior in racial and ethnic minorities (Airhihenbuwa, DiClemente, Wingood, & Lowe, 1992; Dantzker & Eisenman, 2003; Day, 1992; Eisenman & Dantzker, 2004; Erkut, Szalacha, Coil, & Alarcon, 2000; Fierros-Gonzalez & Brown, 2002; Flores, 1992; Pesa & Mathews, 2000). Minority people have to judge things while drawing on emotions and information from at least two perspectives, the majority culture and their own culture, while the majority person may only have to employ one perspective. Another important individual difference is gender: differences between males and females. Gender differences would seem to reflect a variety of cultural, biological, and social influences. In the present study, we are interested in the sexual attitudes of male and female college students at a university near the Mexican border. We use the term Hispanic because that is the most popular term used here. In other parts of the United States, Latino is considered more acceptable and Hispanic may even be seen as unacceptable. The University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA) has the second largest population of students in the nation (second only to Florida International University, in Miami), and 88% of the students attending UTPA are Hispanic. Most of the students at UTPA are bilingual, at least to some degree. Most live in the Rio Grande Valley area of the United States, although a few live in Mexico, and commute to classes. UTPA is part of the University of Texas system, and is the school in that system designated to be the system's number one Hispanic-serving institution. That, and its location near the Mexican border, and in the Rio Grande Valley region, helps explain why UTPA has the largest number of Mexican American students of any university in the nation. Florida International University, in Miami, has a large Cuban student body. Evolutionary Psychology An excellent perspective for understanding biological matters is evolutionary psychology theory. Evolution is the unifying theory in biology. Evolution has also come to be very important for the field of psychology, and may possibly be the number one theory today in psychology, having gained much recent popularity in the field. From an evolutionary psychology standpoint, men and women have different needs, as they try to maximize the survival of themselves and of their offspring into future generations. For men, the optimal strategy to insure their genes going into future generations is to impregnate as many women as possible, leading to a permissive attitude toward sex. Also, men should seek out partners who have youth, health and beauty. Women, on the other hand, get pregnant, and could not effectively employ the male strategy. Their passing on their genes to future generations is best assured by finding a male companion who possesses status and money, and who will invest in taking care of her and her offspring. Thus, women should be less permissive about sex than men, and should be more selective in who they wish to have sexual relations with. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFrench-language works237,207