MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2526225966 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.505.505

Pembrolizumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Keynote-023

2015· article· en· W2526225966 sur OpenAlexaff
Jesús F. San Miguel, María‐Victoria Mateos, Jatin J. Shah, Enrique M. Ocio, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Donna Reece, Nikhil C. Munshi, David Avigan, Yang Ge, Arun Balakumaran, Patricia Marinello, Robert Z. Orlowski, David S. Siegel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLenalidomideMedicineTolerabilityPembrolizumabDexamethasoneInternal medicineMultiple myelomaOncologyClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchNeutropeniaGastroenterologySurgeryAdverse effectClinical trialToxicityImmunotherapyCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Overexpression of PD-L1 is associated with tumor invasiveness in multiple myeloma (MM) cells and may be a mechanism of immune evasion. Pembrolizumab, a highly selective, humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody designed to block interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1 and PD-L2, may synergize with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) to enhance tumor suppression. KEYNOTE-023 (NCT02036502), an open-label, phase 1, multicenter, nonrandomized, dose-escalation trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with RRMM. Methods: Patients with RRMM who have failed ≥2 prior therapies including a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD were enrolled in the study. KEYNOTE-023 uses a modified 3+3 design for dose determination followed by dose confirmation and expansion arms. During the dose determination phase, cohorts of 3-6 patients were enrolled at 2 mg/kg of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) in combination with 10 mg or 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1-21 and 40 mg low-dose dexamethasone weekly, to be repeated every 28 days. After preliminary MTD/MAD was identified, additional patients were to be enrolled at a fixed dose of 200 mg of pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the dose confirmation and expansion arms. Study treatment is to continue for 24 months or until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end points are safety and antitumor activity. Response is evaluated monthly, using IMWG 2006 criteria. Other end points include complete remission (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: As of July 2015, a total of 34 patients with RRMM have been enrolled in the study. Data from 17 patients included in the dose determination and dose confirmation phase are presented in this abstract. All available data for patients currently enrolled in the study will be presented at the upcoming meeting. In the dose determination and dose confirmation phase, 4 patients were treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg and lenalidomide 10 mg and 13 patients were treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or a fixed dose of 200 mg and lenalidomide 25 mg. All patients were treated with low-dose dexamethasone. The median age was 60 (46-76) years, and 59% of patients had stage (ISS) III disease. Patients were heavily pretreated: 53% had ≥3 prior therapies, 41% had IMiDs-refractory disease, and 18% had double refractory disease. Sixteen patients (94%) experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE) of any grade related to study treatment and 10 patients (58%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs. No death or treatment discontinuation for toxicity has been observed. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were: thrombocytopenia (47%), neutropenia (41%), fatigue (29%), and anemia, hyperglycemia, and muscle spasms (23% each). No DLTs were observed in the 10-mg lenalidomide cohort. In the 25-mg lenalidomide cohort, 3 patients (3/13) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT): neutropenia (grade 3 and grade 4), infectious pneumonia (grade 3), and tumor lysis syndrome (grade 3) with hyperuricemia (grade 4). All patients recovered from the DLTs without treatment discontinuation. Based upon these data the MTD/MAD was defined as pembrolizumab 200 mg fixed dose in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg and low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg. With a median follow-up of 287 days (48-476), 13/17 patients responded to treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 76%, with 4 patients achieving a very good partial response and 9 patients achieving a partial response. ORR has also been observed in patients with IMiDs-refractory and double refractory disease. Updated efficacy data, including DOR, will be presented. Conclusions: The preliminary results of KEYNOTE-023 indicate that PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone is associated with a tolerable safety profile and promising antimyeloma activity in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. Disclosures San Miguel: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: The PD-1 pathway is an important mechanism of immune evasion for many tumors. Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on the tumor cell surface and, based upon pembrolizumab's antitumor immune activity in several solid tumors, it may be an effective option for treating hematological malignancies.. Mateos:Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Array: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reece:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Osuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ge:Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA: Employment, Equity Ownership. Balakumaran:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Marinello:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Array Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Biotheryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,306
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,694

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations90
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207