MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526225966 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.505.505

Pembrolizumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Keynote-023

2015· article· en· W2526225966 on OpenAlexaff
Jesús F. San Miguel, María‐Victoria Mateos, Jatin J. Shah, Enrique M. Ocio, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Donna Reece, Nikhil C. Munshi, David Avigan, Yang Ge, Arun Balakumaran, Patricia Marinello, Robert Z. Orlowski, David S. Siegel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenalidomideMedicineTolerabilityPembrolizumabDexamethasoneInternal medicineMultiple myelomaOncologyClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchNeutropeniaGastroenterologySurgeryAdverse effectClinical trialToxicityImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Overexpression of PD-L1 is associated with tumor invasiveness in multiple myeloma (MM) cells and may be a mechanism of immune evasion. Pembrolizumab, a highly selective, humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody designed to block interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1 and PD-L2, may synergize with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) to enhance tumor suppression. KEYNOTE-023 (NCT02036502), an open-label, phase 1, multicenter, nonrandomized, dose-escalation trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with RRMM. Methods: Patients with RRMM who have failed ≥2 prior therapies including a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD were enrolled in the study. KEYNOTE-023 uses a modified 3+3 design for dose determination followed by dose confirmation and expansion arms. During the dose determination phase, cohorts of 3-6 patients were enrolled at 2 mg/kg of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) in combination with 10 mg or 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1-21 and 40 mg low-dose dexamethasone weekly, to be repeated every 28 days. After preliminary MTD/MAD was identified, additional patients were to be enrolled at a fixed dose of 200 mg of pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the dose confirmation and expansion arms. Study treatment is to continue for 24 months or until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end points are safety and antitumor activity. Response is evaluated monthly, using IMWG 2006 criteria. Other end points include complete remission (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: As of July 2015, a total of 34 patients with RRMM have been enrolled in the study. Data from 17 patients included in the dose determination and dose confirmation phase are presented in this abstract. All available data for patients currently enrolled in the study will be presented at the upcoming meeting. In the dose determination and dose confirmation phase, 4 patients were treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg and lenalidomide 10 mg and 13 patients were treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or a fixed dose of 200 mg and lenalidomide 25 mg. All patients were treated with low-dose dexamethasone. The median age was 60 (46-76) years, and 59% of patients had stage (ISS) III disease. Patients were heavily pretreated: 53% had ≥3 prior therapies, 41% had IMiDs-refractory disease, and 18% had double refractory disease. Sixteen patients (94%) experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE) of any grade related to study treatment and 10 patients (58%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs. No death or treatment discontinuation for toxicity has been observed. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were: thrombocytopenia (47%), neutropenia (41%), fatigue (29%), and anemia, hyperglycemia, and muscle spasms (23% each). No DLTs were observed in the 10-mg lenalidomide cohort. In the 25-mg lenalidomide cohort, 3 patients (3/13) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT): neutropenia (grade 3 and grade 4), infectious pneumonia (grade 3), and tumor lysis syndrome (grade 3) with hyperuricemia (grade 4). All patients recovered from the DLTs without treatment discontinuation. Based upon these data the MTD/MAD was defined as pembrolizumab 200 mg fixed dose in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg and low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg. With a median follow-up of 287 days (48-476), 13/17 patients responded to treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 76%, with 4 patients achieving a very good partial response and 9 patients achieving a partial response. ORR has also been observed in patients with IMiDs-refractory and double refractory disease. Updated efficacy data, including DOR, will be presented. Conclusions: The preliminary results of KEYNOTE-023 indicate that PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone is associated with a tolerable safety profile and promising antimyeloma activity in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. Disclosures San Miguel: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: The PD-1 pathway is an important mechanism of immune evasion for many tumors. Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on the tumor cell surface and, based upon pembrolizumab's antitumor immune activity in several solid tumors, it may be an effective option for treating hematological malignancies.. Mateos:Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Array: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reece:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Osuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ge:Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA: Employment, Equity Ownership. Balakumaran:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership. Marinello:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Array Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Biotheryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207