SL-401, A Targeted Therapy Directed to the Interleukin-3 Receptor Present On Leukemia Blasts and Cancer Stem Cells, Is Active As a Single Agent in Patients with Advanced AML
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3625 Background: SL-401 is a novel biologic targeted therapy, comprised of human IL-3 coupled to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload that inhibits protein synthesis, directed at the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R). IL-3R is overexpressed on leukemia blasts and cancer stem cells (CSCs) relative to normal hematopoietic cells. Since SL-401 uniquely targets both the leukemia blasts (tumor bulk) and CSCs, it would be expected to induce tumor regression (anti-tumor bulk effect), as well as inhibit tumor repopulation (anti-CSC effect), thereby improving survival. SL-401 has been evaluated in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial in patients with advanced hematologic cancers. In this study, SL-401 has demonstrated objective clinical responses, including durable complete responses (CRs) and protracted overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated AML. The current report is a final analysis of the patients with AML or MDS. Study Design: Seventy-eight patients with advanced hematologic cancers, including relapsed or refractory AML (n = 59), de novo AML unfit for chemotherapy (n = 11), high-risk MDS (n = 7), and other (n = 1), were enrolled in a multicenter study. Among the patients with relapsed or refractory AML, the numbers of patients receiving SL-401 as 2nd, 3rd, or >3rd line therapy were 24, 16, and 19, respectively. The median (range) age for AML patients was 65 (7, 84) years. Patients received SL-401 as a 15-minute intravenous infusion in one of two dosing regimens for a single cycle to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess antitumor activity. In Regimen A, 45 patients received doses ranging from 4 to 12.5 μg/kg every other day for up to 6 doses. In Regimen B, 33 patients received doses ranging from 7.1 to 22.1 μg/kg daily for up to 5 doses. Results: A single cycle of SL-401 demonstrated single agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML, including 2 durable CRs of 8 and >25 months duration and 5 partial responses (PRs). OS was also notable among patients who received one cycle of SL-401 as ≥3rd line therapy for AML; the median OS was 3.6 (2.3, 6.1) months. Moreover, at therapeutically relevant doses, defined as the MTD or one or two dose levels below the MTD (9.4, 12.5, or 16.6 μg/kg/day), the median OS among AML patients who received SL-401 as ≥3rdline therapy (n = 16) was 5.6 (2.5, 10.8) months. These OS values compared favorably to historical results of 1.5 months for patients treated with standard chemotherapy. SL-401 was well tolerated. The MTD was not achieved with Regimen A, whereas the MTD for Regimen B was 16.6 μg/kg/day, with manifestations of capillary leak syndrome, including hypoalbuminemia and edema, as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the 22.1 μg/kg/day dose level. Transient (i.e., lasting ≤2 weeks) transaminase elevations were among the most common ≥Grade 3 AEs. Notably, there was no evidence of treatment-related bone marrow suppression. Conclusion: SL-401 demonstrated single agent anti-tumor activity and was well tolerated in patients with advanced AML. Improved survival was observed among patients who received a single cycle of SL-401 as ≥3rd line treatment, a disease setting in which there is no standard therapy. SL-401 may be an attractive treatment option for these patients given their tendency to be myelosuppressed and therefore are often poor candidates for myelosupressive therapies that have limited benefit on clinical response and survival in this setting. Based on these positive findings, SL-401 will be advanced into a randomized Phase 2b trial to treat patients with AML in the 3rd line setting. Patients will be randomized to treatment with either multiple cycles of SL-401 or physician's choice, which will consist of available standard therapeutic agents. In addition, the efficacy and safety of SL-401-based combination therapy will also be studied in earlier lines of AML given the lack of overlapping toxicities with existing hematologic cancer therapies. Disclosures: Konopleva: Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cirrito:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Hoberman:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Szarek:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Rowinsky:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bergstein:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Frankel:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».