MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2536831387 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.4433.4433

Associations Between Baseline Mutation Status and Response to Treatment with Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2012· article· en· W2536831387 sur OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey H. Lipton, Franck E. Nicolini, Meir Wetzler, Luke P. Akard, Michele Baccarani, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Adam Craig, Jörge E. Cortes

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaTolerabilityImatinibPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyOncologyImmunologyAdverse effectClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4433 Background Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is an investigational, first-in-class cephalotaxine and is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine reduces levels of multiple oncoproteins, including Bcr-Abl, and induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells by blocking the initial step of protein translation at the level of the ribosome. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity and adequate tolerability in two phase 2, open-label, international, multicenter studies in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients with a history of the T315I mutation who failed prior imatinib were enrolled in the first study (CML202). Patients were enrolled in the second study (CML203) if they had resistance or intolerance to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Point mutations occur frequently in CML patients who develop resistance to imatinib. This is a post hoc analysis of responses to omacetaxine in patients with any phase CML by mutational status. Methods Data from patients with CML in chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), or blast phase (BP) were included from the two phase 2 studies. Omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 14 consecutive days every 28 days for induction and the same dosage for 7 days every 28 days as maintenance. An exploratory analysis was conducted to elucidate associations between mutation status and complete hematologic response (CHR) or major cytogenetic response (MCyR) following omacetaxine treatment. Results Among CP, AP, and BP patients, grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were thrombocytopenia (in 89/105, 43/49, and 43/44 patients, respectively), neutropenia (86/106, 35/49, 36/44), leukopenia (76/106, 30/49, 29/44), and anemia (66/107, 39/49, 36/44). Common grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events included fatigue (5/108, 5/51, and 2/44 patients, respectively) and pneumonia (3/108, 4/51, and 2/44). Seventy-six deaths occurred during long-term follow-up (33, 24, 19); 8 were treatment-related (5, 2, 1), most commonly due to sepsis (n=3). The pooled baseline mutational analysis included 203 CML patients (108 CP, 51 AP, and 44 BP). Unknown mutations were noted in 24%, 25%, and 32% of CP, AP and BP patients, respectively. Mutations were identified in 52%, 51%, and 52% while no mutation status was recorded for 24%, 25%, and 16% of CP, AP, and BP patients, respectively. T315I was the most frequently identified mutation (Table), occurring in 36%, 24%, and 39% of patients, respectively. Multiple mutations, which include individual mutations listed separately, were detected in 12% CP, 14% AP, and 7% BP patients. Among patients with CP or AP CML, CHR rate was high in the presence of the T315I mutation. MCyR rates for CP patients were similar for patients with or without mutations but appeared to be relatively lower among patients with multiple mutations. Among AP patients, MCyR only occurred in those without mutations. Conclusions Point mutations, particularly T315I, were common in this heavily treated population of CML patients although T315I may be overrepresented due to CML202 inclusion criteria. Efficacy of omacetaxine, as measured by rates of CHR and MCyR, appeared to be largely independent of the presence or absence of point mutations. However, interpretation of these results is limited by small sample sizes in many of the groups. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity in 2 studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), one in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation and the other in patients failing at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Nicolini:BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau. Wetzler:BMS: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Akard:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:Teva: Research Funding. Kantarjian:ChemGenex (Teva): Research Funding. Craig:Teva: Consultancy. Cortes:Chemgenex (Teva): Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207