MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2544348763

The Arctic Testbed – Providing GNSS Services in the Arctic Region

2013· article· en· W2544348763 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Per Erik Kvam, M. Jeannot

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueGNSS positioning and interference
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArcticGNSS applicationsGeographyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemOceanographyTelecommunicationsGeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background The Arctic is a new frontier that opens up new possibilities and industrial potential. However, the Arctic has a fragile marine environment with one of the world’s most fertile ecosystems. In order to have sustainable activity in this region all means contributing to responsible and secure operations should be considered. The activity in the Arctic is increasing. The Northern Passages are predicted to become a more viable shipping route in the future, as a result of the retreat of the Arctic ice cap. 25% of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas resources are expected to be found in the Arctic. The fascinating world of the Arctic attracts an increasing number of tourists, leading to increased hazard of injury to persons as well as environmental impact. Then, on the other hand, the Arctic includes breeding grounds for a significant percentage of the world’s wild fish populations. High latitudes poses special challenges to GNSS systems. Operating in these vast areas with minimal or non-existing infrastructure makes GNSS a crucial asset. There is limited coverage in the Arctic of existing SBAS like EGNOS, WAAS and SDCM. EGNOS coverage is presently defined up to 70 degrees North, and the performance is decreasing when approaching this Northern limit. Objectives The main objective of Arctic Testbed is to contribute to extending secure satellite navigation in the Arctic. In particular, it will complement EGNOS in the North, targeting coverage up to 85 degrees North. Further, it will extend coverage to the West, bridging the gap between EGNOS and WAAS in the Northern Atlantic. The following characteristics of the Arctic are drivers on SBAS performance: • Sparsely populated areas, with lack of infrastructure, limiting the selection of sites for reference stations. • Northern parts not covered by geostationary communication satellites. • Vast areas of sea, limiting available land for location of reference stations. • Specific ionospheric dynamics, making it harder to predict the ionospheric corrections. • Inclination of GNSS satellites at about 55 degrees gives lower elevation of the satellites. Methodology The Arctic Testbed will be an SBAS system prototype. As there are limitations in coverage of geostationary satellites in the Arctic, the broadcast to users will also be by alternative radio means, e.g. non-geostationary satellite system like Iridium, or terrestrial systems. This will help overcoming the lack of coverage of geostationary communication satellites. The Arctic Testbed will allow including both GPS and GLONASS, and could in the future also include Galileo. This will provide corrections to the users for more satellites, and hence provide better geometry and better RAIM capabilities. The Arctic Testbed will target two main groups of users, namely Aviation Users and Maritime Users. Current MOPS (DO229D) applies to single frequency users. Even if GPS L2 cannot be used by aviation users, the frequency can be used by other user groups, like maritime users. Therefore correction data will be provided for both single and dual frequency users. However, for aviation users this will allow investigating the performance of a dual frequency GNSS, hence being an early indication of the performance that can be expected from a dual frequency (GPS L1/L5, Galileo E1/E5) SBAS. The Arctic Testbed will include reference stations data from EGNOS, as well as additional reference stations in the Arctic region. This includes reference stations in Greenland, Jan-Mayen, Spitsbergen and Norway. This network will allow monitoring the specifics of the ionosphere in the Arctic region, e.g. scintillation effects. The generation of the SBAS service will be done at a processing centre in Honefoss, Norway. Processing will be based on the same algorithms that are used in EGNOS, but adapted for the Arctic Testbed. The Arctic Testbed project is initiated by ESA. Kongsberg Seatex is assigned as prime contractor, heading a team of eight partners: GMV Aerospace and Defence, Thales Alenia Space France, Logica, Terma, Norwegian Mapping Authority, Technical University of Denmark, Septentrio and University of Calgary. Anticipated results Implementation of the Arctic Testbed is followed by a period of experiments and demonstrations, with first results expected in 2014. Simulations indicate that the system could provide an SBAS prototype service at APV-1 level from Spitsbergen to Greenland. Conclusion/Significance of the work The experiments and demonstrations will allow collecting valuable experience on the provision of SBAS in the Arctic, and hence provide input for the definition of the next version of EGNOS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,214
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,575

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013)Même sujetGNSS positioning and interferenceTravaux en français237 207