MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544348763

The Arctic Testbed – Providing GNSS Services in the Arctic Region

2013· article· en· W2544348763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Per Erik Kvam, M. Jeannot

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticGNSS applicationsGeographyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemOceanographyTelecommunicationsGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Arctic is a new frontier that opens up new possibilities and industrial potential. However, the Arctic has a fragile marine environment with one of the world’s most fertile ecosystems. In order to have sustainable activity in this region all means contributing to responsible and secure operations should be considered. The activity in the Arctic is increasing. The Northern Passages are predicted to become a more viable shipping route in the future, as a result of the retreat of the Arctic ice cap. 25% of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas resources are expected to be found in the Arctic. The fascinating world of the Arctic attracts an increasing number of tourists, leading to increased hazard of injury to persons as well as environmental impact. Then, on the other hand, the Arctic includes breeding grounds for a significant percentage of the world’s wild fish populations. High latitudes poses special challenges to GNSS systems. Operating in these vast areas with minimal or non-existing infrastructure makes GNSS a crucial asset. There is limited coverage in the Arctic of existing SBAS like EGNOS, WAAS and SDCM. EGNOS coverage is presently defined up to 70 degrees North, and the performance is decreasing when approaching this Northern limit. Objectives The main objective of Arctic Testbed is to contribute to extending secure satellite navigation in the Arctic. In particular, it will complement EGNOS in the North, targeting coverage up to 85 degrees North. Further, it will extend coverage to the West, bridging the gap between EGNOS and WAAS in the Northern Atlantic. The following characteristics of the Arctic are drivers on SBAS performance: • Sparsely populated areas, with lack of infrastructure, limiting the selection of sites for reference stations. • Northern parts not covered by geostationary communication satellites. • Vast areas of sea, limiting available land for location of reference stations. • Specific ionospheric dynamics, making it harder to predict the ionospheric corrections. • Inclination of GNSS satellites at about 55 degrees gives lower elevation of the satellites. Methodology The Arctic Testbed will be an SBAS system prototype. As there are limitations in coverage of geostationary satellites in the Arctic, the broadcast to users will also be by alternative radio means, e.g. non-geostationary satellite system like Iridium, or terrestrial systems. This will help overcoming the lack of coverage of geostationary communication satellites. The Arctic Testbed will allow including both GPS and GLONASS, and could in the future also include Galileo. This will provide corrections to the users for more satellites, and hence provide better geometry and better RAIM capabilities. The Arctic Testbed will target two main groups of users, namely Aviation Users and Maritime Users. Current MOPS (DO229D) applies to single frequency users. Even if GPS L2 cannot be used by aviation users, the frequency can be used by other user groups, like maritime users. Therefore correction data will be provided for both single and dual frequency users. However, for aviation users this will allow investigating the performance of a dual frequency GNSS, hence being an early indication of the performance that can be expected from a dual frequency (GPS L1/L5, Galileo E1/E5) SBAS. The Arctic Testbed will include reference stations data from EGNOS, as well as additional reference stations in the Arctic region. This includes reference stations in Greenland, Jan-Mayen, Spitsbergen and Norway. This network will allow monitoring the specifics of the ionosphere in the Arctic region, e.g. scintillation effects. The generation of the SBAS service will be done at a processing centre in Honefoss, Norway. Processing will be based on the same algorithms that are used in EGNOS, but adapted for the Arctic Testbed. The Arctic Testbed project is initiated by ESA. Kongsberg Seatex is assigned as prime contractor, heading a team of eight partners: GMV Aerospace and Defence, Thales Alenia Space France, Logica, Terma, Norwegian Mapping Authority, Technical University of Denmark, Septentrio and University of Calgary. Anticipated results Implementation of the Arctic Testbed is followed by a period of experiments and demonstrations, with first results expected in 2014. Simulations indicate that the system could provide an SBAS prototype service at APV-1 level from Spitsbergen to Greenland. Conclusion/Significance of the work The experiments and demonstrations will allow collecting valuable experience on the provision of SBAS in the Arctic, and hence provide input for the definition of the next version of EGNOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013)Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207