A Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox Versus Deferoxamine in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD): 2-Year Results Including Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Deferasirox with Concomitant Hydroxyurea Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1082 Background: Long-term efficacy and safety of the iron chelator deferasirox in SCD patients has been previously reported (Vichinsky et al. BJH 2011). Hydroxyurea (HU), a common treatment for SCD, is associated with adverse events (AEs) such as bone marrow depression. However, long-term data for iron chelation and concomitant HU are limited. This study provides further efficacy and safety data for deferasirox including PK and safety data + HU. Methods: SCD patients aged ≥2 yrs and iron overload from blood transfusions were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to deferasirox (DFX; 20 mg/kg/day) or deferoxamine (DFO; 175 mg/kg/week [wk]) for 24 wks (24-wk DFX or DFO cohort). DFO patients then crossed over to DFX; all patients received DFX up to Wk 52. Patients entered a 52-wk extension receiving DFX (DFX up to 2 yrs cohort). PK sampling was carried out pre- and 2 hrs post-dose in patients on DFX at Wk 12. Plasma concentrations of DFX and iron-complex Fe-[DFX]2 were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Dose adjustments were implemented for changes in patient weight, serum ferritin, serum creatinine, liver function tests and rash. Primary objective was DFX safety compared with DFO during 24 wks. Secondary objectives included DFX safety and efficacy for up to 2 yrs and DFX safety in patients with concomitant HU. Results: 24-weeks, DFX (n=135) vs DFO (n=68). Patients were severely iron overloaded at baseline (BL); 37% had serum ferritin ≥4000 ng/mL (median 3385 ng/mL). In the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively, 93 and 78% of patients completed 24 wks of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 0 and 1 (1.8%) patient in the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively. Investigator-assessed drug-related AEs were reported in 27 and 29% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively; most common (>5%) were gastrointestinal (DFX vs DFO cohort: diarrhea 10.4 vs 3.6%; nausea 5.2 vs 3.6%). Serious AEs (any causality) were reported in 30 and 36% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively. One death occurred in the DFX cohort, not considered drug-related (patient had past history of multi-organ failure). At the 3–6 month timepoint, median change from BL in serum ferritin was –196 (range –4029 to 10,168) and –400 (range –10,001 to 3908) ng/mL for DFX (n=130) and DFO (n=58) cohorts, respectively. Up to 2 years DFX (n=188). 135 (72%) patients who received DFX completed the study; 5 (3%) patients discontinued due to AEs. Average actual dose was 21.2 ± 3.6 mg/kg/day. Most common investigator-assessed drug-related AEs (>5%) were diarrhea (11.7%), nausea (6.9%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). Drug-related serious AEs were reported in 8 (4.3%) patients; most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and abnormal liver function test (n=2, for each). One additional death occurred; not considered drug-related (patient had history of congestive heart failure with worsening pulmonary hypertension). 4 patients had 2 consecutive serum creatinine increases >33% above BL and >upper limit of normal; increases were transient and resolved with dose adjustment or temporary interruption. Mean ± SE change from BL in serum ferritin (per-protocol, adjusted for amount of transfused blood) was –683 ± 205 ng/mL (n=87). PK, safety and efficacy of DFX + HU (n=28) and DFX (n=160). Mean DFX concentration (μmol/L) pre- and 2-hr post-dose were similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=81); pre-dose 13.3 vs 19.8, post-dose 74.2 vs 79.4. Mean Fe-[DFX]2 concentration (μmol/L) pre- and post-dose was similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=85); pre-dose 0.9 vs 0.6, post-dose 1.9 vs 1.7. One of 5 patients discontinuing DFX due to AEs was receiving concomitant HU. Overall the type and incidence of AEs in patients receiving DFX + HU vs DFX were similar (Table). At the 21–24 month time-point, mean change in serum ferritin was –593 ng/mL (n=15) and –721 ng/mL (n=81) for DFX + HU vs DFX cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, this study confirms that deferasirox has a clinically manageable safety profile, and is comparable overall with DFO in SCD patients, with many AEs related to the underlying condition (eg, sickle cell anemia with crisis, pyrexia, infections). This study confirms the long-term efficacy of deferasirox with clinically meaningful reductions in serum ferritin over 2 years. PK, efficacy and overall safety of deferasirox were not influenced by concomitant HU. Disclosures: Vichinsky: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Habr:Novartis: Employment. Lynch:Novartis: Employment. Zhang:Novartis: Employment. Files:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Medical University of South Carolina: Research contract agreement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».