MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2547136103 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.1082.1082

A Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox Versus Deferoxamine in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD): 2-Year Results Including Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Deferasirox with Concomitant Hydroxyurea Therapy

2011· article· en· W2547136103 sur OpenAlexaff
Elliott Vichinsky, Marcela Torres, Jonathan Glass, Caterina P. Minniti, Stéphane Barrette, Dany Habr, Nicola Lynch, Yiyun Zhang, Beatrice Files

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDeferasiroxMedicineDeferoxamineConcomitantAdverse effectInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgeryThalassemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1082 Background: Long-term efficacy and safety of the iron chelator deferasirox in SCD patients has been previously reported (Vichinsky et al. BJH 2011). Hydroxyurea (HU), a common treatment for SCD, is associated with adverse events (AEs) such as bone marrow depression. However, long-term data for iron chelation and concomitant HU are limited. This study provides further efficacy and safety data for deferasirox including PK and safety data + HU. Methods: SCD patients aged ≥2 yrs and iron overload from blood transfusions were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to deferasirox (DFX; 20 mg/kg/day) or deferoxamine (DFO; 175 mg/kg/week [wk]) for 24 wks (24-wk DFX or DFO cohort). DFO patients then crossed over to DFX; all patients received DFX up to Wk 52. Patients entered a 52-wk extension receiving DFX (DFX up to 2 yrs cohort). PK sampling was carried out pre- and 2 hrs post-dose in patients on DFX at Wk 12. Plasma concentrations of DFX and iron-complex Fe-[DFX]2 were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Dose adjustments were implemented for changes in patient weight, serum ferritin, serum creatinine, liver function tests and rash. Primary objective was DFX safety compared with DFO during 24 wks. Secondary objectives included DFX safety and efficacy for up to 2 yrs and DFX safety in patients with concomitant HU. Results: 24-weeks, DFX (n=135) vs DFO (n=68). Patients were severely iron overloaded at baseline (BL); 37% had serum ferritin ≥4000 ng/mL (median 3385 ng/mL). In the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively, 93 and 78% of patients completed 24 wks of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 0 and 1 (1.8%) patient in the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively. Investigator-assessed drug-related AEs were reported in 27 and 29% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively; most common (>5%) were gastrointestinal (DFX vs DFO cohort: diarrhea 10.4 vs 3.6%; nausea 5.2 vs 3.6%). Serious AEs (any causality) were reported in 30 and 36% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively. One death occurred in the DFX cohort, not considered drug-related (patient had past history of multi-organ failure). At the 3–6 month timepoint, median change from BL in serum ferritin was –196 (range –4029 to 10,168) and –400 (range –10,001 to 3908) ng/mL for DFX (n=130) and DFO (n=58) cohorts, respectively. Up to 2 years DFX (n=188). 135 (72%) patients who received DFX completed the study; 5 (3%) patients discontinued due to AEs. Average actual dose was 21.2 ± 3.6 mg/kg/day. Most common investigator-assessed drug-related AEs (>5%) were diarrhea (11.7%), nausea (6.9%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). Drug-related serious AEs were reported in 8 (4.3%) patients; most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and abnormal liver function test (n=2, for each). One additional death occurred; not considered drug-related (patient had history of congestive heart failure with worsening pulmonary hypertension). 4 patients had 2 consecutive serum creatinine increases >33% above BL and >upper limit of normal; increases were transient and resolved with dose adjustment or temporary interruption. Mean ± SE change from BL in serum ferritin (per-protocol, adjusted for amount of transfused blood) was –683 ± 205 ng/mL (n=87). PK, safety and efficacy of DFX + HU (n=28) and DFX (n=160). Mean DFX concentration (μmol/L) pre- and 2-hr post-dose were similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=81); pre-dose 13.3 vs 19.8, post-dose 74.2 vs 79.4. Mean Fe-[DFX]2 concentration (μmol/L) pre- and post-dose was similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=85); pre-dose 0.9 vs 0.6, post-dose 1.9 vs 1.7. One of 5 patients discontinuing DFX due to AEs was receiving concomitant HU. Overall the type and incidence of AEs in patients receiving DFX + HU vs DFX were similar (Table). At the 21–24 month time-point, mean change in serum ferritin was –593 ng/mL (n=15) and –721 ng/mL (n=81) for DFX + HU vs DFX cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, this study confirms that deferasirox has a clinically manageable safety profile, and is comparable overall with DFO in SCD patients, with many AEs related to the underlying condition (eg, sickle cell anemia with crisis, pyrexia, infections). This study confirms the long-term efficacy of deferasirox with clinically meaningful reductions in serum ferritin over 2 years. PK, efficacy and overall safety of deferasirox were not influenced by concomitant HU. Disclosures: Vichinsky: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Habr:Novartis: Employment. Lynch:Novartis: Employment. Zhang:Novartis: Employment. Files:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Medical University of South Carolina: Research contract agreement.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207