Effectively Targeting Treatment-Naïve CML Stem/Progenitor Cells From Imatinib-Nonresponders With Combination Treatments Of JAK2 and ABL Inhibitors In Vitro and In Vivo
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the presence of a BCR-ABL fusion gene that originates in hematopoietic stem cells. The BCR-ABL oncoprotein has constitutively elevated tyrosine kinase (TK) activity and drives CML pathogenesis. Introduction of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) and other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies has had a major impact on the treatment of chronic phase CML, but early relapses and persistence of leukemic stem cells remain problematic. We have recently identified an AHI-1–BCR-ABL–JAK2 protein complex that contributes to the transforming activity of BCR-ABL and to IM-resistance of CML stem/progenitor cells. We therefore hypothesized that combined suppression of BCR-ABL and JAK2 activities might more effectively eliminate CML stem/progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. Several JAK2 inhibitors are currently in various stages of clinical trials, but their off-target effects on normal primitive hematopoietic cells remain a concern. We have now examined the biological effects of an orally bioavailable, selective JAK2 inhibitor (BMS-911543) in combination with TKIs, including IM, dasatinib (DA) and nilotinib, both on CML cells lines and CD34+ treatment-naïve IM-nonresponder cells, which were obtained at diagnosis from CML patients who were classified subsequently, after initiation of IM therapy, as IM-nonresponders. In cell line studies, Western blot analysis showed that combination treatment was more effective at reducing pSTAT5 levels in K562 cells and IM-resistant K562 cells than single agents. In colony-forming cell (CFC) assays, combination treatment resulted in a greater reduction in colonies produced from these cells compared to single agents (2-3 fold, p<0.05). Similarly, intracellular staining analyses showed that combined exposure of CD34+ CML cells (n=4) to BMS-911543 and a TKI produced a deeper, more prolonged suppression of pSTAT5 and pCRKL activity than single agents (40-46% suppression for the combinations vs. 15-20% suppression for the single agents at 72 hrs, p<0.05). Combination treatments also resulted in greater inhibition of colony growth of CD34+ CML cells compared to single agents (n=7, 74-86% vs. 40-50%, p<0.05). Interestingly, the combination of BMS-911543 and a TKI almost completely inhibited BFU-E colony formation as compared to treatment with TKI alone (92-100% vs.63-66%, p<0.01). CFU-GM colonies were also more significantly reduced as a result of combination treatment, compared to single agents (49-71% vs. 30-39%, p<0.01). Long-term culture-initiating cell assays showed that more primitive cells were also more significantly eliminated by combination treatments (n=3, 2-3 fold, p<0.05). Importantly, our CFC data indicate that BMS-911543 is less toxic to normal bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells (n=7) than the same cells from CML samples (n=7, 2-3 fold, p<0.05). To test the ability of combination treatments to eliminate primitive CML cells with in vivo leukemia propagating activity, we injected primitive CML cells intravenously into NSG mice and treated mice with inhibitors by oral gavage for two weeks. Mice undergoing combination treatment showed significantly reduced weight loss and engraftment levels in peripheral blood, BM , spleen, and liver compared to mice treated with single agents (0.14% vs. 6.14%, 1.17% vs. 26.3%, 2.46% vs. 51.5%, and 77.8% vs. 92.9%, respectively, p<0.05). H&E histology staining revealed that mice treated with DA and BMS-911543 had less infiltration of leukemic cells into their spleens and livers than mice treated with DA alone. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis further demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels in spleen, liver, and BM of mice treated with a combination of DA and BMS-911543 compared to mice treated with single agents (15-20 fold, p<0.05). Most importantly, combination treatments significantly enhanced survival of leukemic mice compared to mice treated with single agents (median survival of IM + BMS-911543 vs. IM: 70 days vs. 60.5 days, p<0.05; DA + BMS-911543 vs. DA: 96.5 days vs. 81 days, p<0.001). This study suggests that simultaneously targeting BCR-ABL and JAK2 activities in CML stem/progenitor cells may improve outcomes in patients, especially those destined to develop TKI resistance. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».