MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2549253264

THE OCTOBER HANDSHAKE OF 1970: Making Sense of Canada's Recognition of the People's Republic of China

2011· article· en· W2549253264 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Ka Ho Li

Notice bibliographique

RevueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHandshakeChinaHistoryPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

After two decades of a disappointing relationship between Canada and the People's Republic of China (PRC)-seriously damaged during the Korean War and relieved by wheat sales after the Great Leap-Pierre Trudeau's government wanted to end China's isolation.The new prime minister was determined to ensure that his country could recognize the Communist regime.Even more surprisingly, Ottawa's opening of relations with Beijing would soon be followed by Washington.Such words as "rapprochement" were therefore repeated in North America as this extraordinary diplomatic event began to unfold in the late 1960s.In hindsight, Sino-Canadian rapprochement seems full of contradictions: at a time when Canada's closest ally was still fighting in Vietnam, and when the Chinese were shouting anti-imperialist slogans during the Cultural Revolution, how could it be possible that Ottawa and Beijing wished to become friends?The central question this thesis poses and answers is why the two governments suddenly shifted positions at such a politically sensitive moment.Offering different ways to understand this thirty-year-old question, the thesis re-examines Trudeau's and Maoist China's remarkable, but often forgotten, diplomatic breakthrough.Indeed, although Canadians were paying closer attention to the nation's "October Crisis" in 1970, the "October Handshake" in Stockholm between representatives of Canada and China in the same month was also a iii significant event.The success of such a diplomatic achievement could be seen in the Sino-American rapprochement that followed and in China's new place in the world community.Drawing on various historical records, including materials from the archives of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Queen's University, this study explains the agreement between Beijing and Ottawa in 1970 as the coincidence of three crucial conditions: the rapidly changing geopolitical circumstances at the time, a favourable internal political climate, and the matching mentality of the extraordinary players from both countries.Furthermore, while existing accounts of Sino-Canadian rapprochement highlight both countries' external relations, this thesis will argue that an exploration of the dynamics of domestic politics and the roles of individual leaders can expand our understanding of decision-making during the process of normalization of relations between China and Canada.Chapter 1 diplomatic relations with China.By then, Ottawa's decisions were clearly a manifestation of Cold War geopolitics characterized by East-West confrontation and China's isolation.Two decades later, anti-imperialism was still a clear component of the PRC's foreign policy throughout the early phase of the Cultural Revolution.Given that Canadians had fought against Chinese troops on the Korean War battlefield, Canada was sometimes regarded by the Chinese as simply a partner of American imperialist policy.If the Chinese leaders were to act according to their Cultural Revolution rhetoric, then normalization of relations would not be possible.On the other side, a policy of rapprochement towards Red China would unquestionably anger Canada's closest ally.To Washington, it was one of the most irritating Canadian foreign policies of the era.Therefore in 1966 and 1967, the chances for any relationship between China and Canada seemed slim.In order to fully understand the context of the historical Sino-Canadian rapprochement of 1970, it is important to first explore the political atmosphere between Beijing and Ottawa immediately after Canada's failure to recognize the PRC.Shortly after the inauguration of the PRC on October 1, 1949, bilateral relations became icy when the Korean War broke out in July 1950.When the Korean conflict erupted, the attitude of the United States toward Communist China hardened and the Canadian government considered it prudent to put its recognition plans on hold.More importantly, as the United Nations (UN) declared in February 1951 that the PRC's role in the Korean War was that of an "aggressor," major obstacles appeared in the path of official recognition and Canada put the question aside. 1Since the day that the Korean War became a major conflict between the Chinese and UN forces, Canadians could no longer remain uninvolved as Ottawa took an active role in the war.Some Canadians believed that Communism was a threat to the world and fought in the Korean War.With Canada's increasing involvement in the military conflict, the Chinese felt more suspicious towards Canadians, especially when there was open hostility in the war zone between the Chinese "volunteer fighters" and the Canadian Army under the UN flag. 2 In Chinese eyes, the image of Canadians changed from "foreign friends" to "enemy aliens."According to a Canadian missionary, those who were still in the PRC at the time were seen as enemies, and some as international cultural spies: I, a foreigner, had the alternative of leaving the country [the People's Republic of China].This alternative became realistically the only choice later on when China joined the cause of North Korea, making me an "enemy alien" for I was automatically classed as an anti-revolutionary, especially after the outbreak of the Korean War when all North Americans were enemy aliens.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,254
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,753

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,185
Écart entre enseignants0,172 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Même sujetVietnamese History and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207