Studying the Association of Quality of Life and Happiness among University Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lotfi S, Saberi S -. “Evaluating Quality of urban life using multi-scale decision making method’ Case Study: Urban areas in Yasuj”, Geography and environmental studies: 1[4), pp 45-58, 2012Ghafari G, Karimi A, Nozari H. “The Process of Studying Quality of Life in Iran”, Social Studies and Research: 1[3), pp 107-134, 2012Naghibi F, Golmakani N, Esmaeeli H. “Studying the Association of Life Style with Quality of Life in High School Female Students in Mashhad in School Year 2012-2013”, Woman, Midwifery, and Infertility: 16[6), pp 9-19, 2013Latifi G, Movahedi A. “Studying the Impact of Social Health and its indexes on Quality of Life; Case Study: Meli Bank Employers in Tehran”, Master thesis, Allame Tabatabaee University of Tehran, 2011Azimzadeh A, Hoseini M, Rahmani O. “Studying the Association of Components of Happiness and Personality Model in Students”. Educational Psychology: 2[2), pp 1-12, 2011Mozafari F, Farkhondeh A, Heidarniya A, “The Association of Spritual Health and Happiness in University Students”, Educating Hygiene and Developing Health in Iran Quarterly: 2[2), pp 97-108, 2004Amirpoor B. “The Association of Critical Thinking and its Dimensions with Happiness and Confidence in University Students”, Education Approaches: 5[3), pp 143-147, 2012Giddens A. “Sociology”, Chavoshiyan H translate, Tehran, Nei Press.2010Samiyan H, Naeemi O, Sharabi A, “Studying Happiness and its relationship with demographical characteristics in Para-medicine Students”, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences: 21[86) pp 159-166. 2011Ahmadi A, Taghavi H. “The Impact of mother’s Employment on Educational and behavioral performance in children”, Women Research: 1[5)Hejazi Y, “The Role pf Economical and Social Factors in Educational Achievement and Job performance in Students of Agriculture in Tehran University”, Social Sciences, 2004Dabiri S, Delavar A, Sarami G. “The Predictive Role of parenting Styles and Self-Respect in Happiness of Students”, Upbringing Psychological: 20[7), pp 159-166, 2011Ghafari G, Omidi R, “Quality of Life: the Index of Human Development”, Tehran, Shorazeh PresBuss. D.M. [2000) . The evolution of happiness . American Psychologist, 55[1) Laughin, J. E. , and Huebner, E. S. [2001). Life exprrience locus of control and school satisfaction in adolescence. Social InDicators Research, 55: 156-183.OkroduduG. Influence of parenting styles on adolescent delinquency in Delta Central Senatorial District.EDO Journal of Counselling2010; 3: 58-86Ghafari R, Rafiei M, Taheri-Nejad MR. Assessment of health related quality of life by SF-36 Version 2 in general population of Qom city. Arak Medical University Journal [AMUJ). 2014; 16[80): 62-71.Borglin G, Jakobsson U, Edberg A-K, Hallberg IR. Self-reported health complaints and their prediction of overall and health-related quality of life among elderly people. International journal of nursing studies. 2005;42[2):147-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.003 PMID: 15680613Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey [SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14[3):875-82.Lee TW, Ko IS, Lee KJ. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: A cross-sectional survey. International journal of nursing studies.2006;43[3):293-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.06.009Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, Gray LC. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life [AqoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36.Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2003;56[2):138-47Guallar-Castillón P, Redondo Sendino Á, Banegas JR, López-García E, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Differences in quality of life between women and men in the older population of Spain. Social science & medicine. 2005;60[6):1229-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.003Habibi A, Nemadi-Vosoughi M, Habibi S, Mohammadi M. Quality of Life and Prevalence of Chronic Illnesses among Elderly People: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Ardebil Journal of Health and Hygine. 2012;3[1):58-66.[Persian).Tu YC, Wang RH, Yeh SH.. Relationship between perceived empowerment care and quality of life among elderly residents within nursing homes in Taiwan: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43[6):673-80. Epub 2005 Nov 28 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.003Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D. Do quality of life, participation and environment of older adults differ according to level of activity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2008;6[1):30-1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-30 Hadi N, Malek Makan L. Barresiesathe salamat va keifiate zendegie amouzegarane madarese ebtedaeie shiraz. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2006;10[4):387-92.[Persian) Borg C1, Hallberg IR, Blomqvist K., Hallberg IR. Life satisfaction among older people [65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15[5):607-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».