Studying the Association of Quality of Life and Happiness among University Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lotfi S, Saberi S -. “Evaluating Quality of urban life using multi-scale decision making method’ Case Study: Urban areas in Yasuj”, Geography and environmental studies: 1[4), pp 45-58, 2012Ghafari G, Karimi A, Nozari H. “The Process of Studying Quality of Life in Iran”, Social Studies and Research: 1[3), pp 107-134, 2012Naghibi F, Golmakani N, Esmaeeli H. “Studying the Association of Life Style with Quality of Life in High School Female Students in Mashhad in School Year 2012-2013”, Woman, Midwifery, and Infertility: 16[6), pp 9-19, 2013Latifi G, Movahedi A. “Studying the Impact of Social Health and its indexes on Quality of Life; Case Study: Meli Bank Employers in Tehran”, Master thesis, Allame Tabatabaee University of Tehran, 2011Azimzadeh A, Hoseini M, Rahmani O. “Studying the Association of Components of Happiness and Personality Model in Students”. Educational Psychology: 2[2), pp 1-12, 2011Mozafari F, Farkhondeh A, Heidarniya A, “The Association of Spritual Health and Happiness in University Students”, Educating Hygiene and Developing Health in Iran Quarterly: 2[2), pp 97-108, 2004Amirpoor B. “The Association of Critical Thinking and its Dimensions with Happiness and Confidence in University Students”, Education Approaches: 5[3), pp 143-147, 2012Giddens A. “Sociology”, Chavoshiyan H translate, Tehran, Nei Press.2010Samiyan H, Naeemi O, Sharabi A, “Studying Happiness and its relationship with demographical characteristics in Para-medicine Students”, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences: 21[86) pp 159-166. 2011Ahmadi A, Taghavi H. “The Impact of mother’s Employment on Educational and behavioral performance in children”, Women Research: 1[5)Hejazi Y, “The Role pf Economical and Social Factors in Educational Achievement and Job performance in Students of Agriculture in Tehran University”, Social Sciences, 2004Dabiri S, Delavar A, Sarami G. “The Predictive Role of parenting Styles and Self-Respect in Happiness of Students”, Upbringing Psychological: 20[7), pp 159-166, 2011Ghafari G, Omidi R, “Quality of Life: the Index of Human Development”, Tehran, Shorazeh PresBuss. D.M. [2000) . The evolution of happiness . American Psychologist, 55[1) Laughin, J. E. , and Huebner, E. S. [2001). Life exprrience locus of control and school satisfaction in adolescence. Social InDicators Research, 55: 156-183.OkroduduG. Influence of parenting styles on adolescent delinquency in Delta Central Senatorial District.EDO Journal of Counselling2010; 3: 58-86Ghafari R, Rafiei M, Taheri-Nejad MR. Assessment of health related quality of life by SF-36 Version 2 in general population of Qom city. Arak Medical University Journal [AMUJ). 2014; 16[80): 62-71.Borglin G, Jakobsson U, Edberg A-K, Hallberg IR. Self-reported health complaints and their prediction of overall and health-related quality of life among elderly people. International journal of nursing studies. 2005;42[2):147-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.003 PMID: 15680613Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey [SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14[3):875-82.Lee TW, Ko IS, Lee KJ. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: A cross-sectional survey. International journal of nursing studies.2006;43[3):293-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.06.009Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, Gray LC. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life [AqoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36.Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2003;56[2):138-47Guallar-Castillón P, Redondo Sendino Á, Banegas JR, López-García E, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Differences in quality of life between women and men in the older population of Spain. Social science & medicine. 2005;60[6):1229-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.003Habibi A, Nemadi-Vosoughi M, Habibi S, Mohammadi M. Quality of Life and Prevalence of Chronic Illnesses among Elderly People: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Ardebil Journal of Health and Hygine. 2012;3[1):58-66.[Persian).Tu YC, Wang RH, Yeh SH.. Relationship between perceived empowerment care and quality of life among elderly residents within nursing homes in Taiwan: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43[6):673-80. Epub 2005 Nov 28 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.003Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D. Do quality of life, participation and environment of older adults differ according to level of activity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2008;6[1):30-1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-30 Hadi N, Malek Makan L. Barresiesathe salamat va keifiate zendegie amouzegarane madarese ebtedaeie shiraz. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2006;10[4):387-92.[Persian) Borg C1, Hallberg IR, Blomqvist K., Hallberg IR. Life satisfaction among older people [65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15[5):607-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".