MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2553702823 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.5734.5734

A Phase II Study of AT9283, an Aurora Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapased or Refractory Multiple Myloma; NCIC Clinical Trials Group IND.191

2014· article· en· W2553702823 sur OpenAlexaff
Annette E. Hay, Alli Murugesan, Ashley DiPasquale, Tom Kouroukis, Irwindeep Sandhu, Vishal Kukreti, Nizar J. Bahlis, Johan Lategan, Donna Reece, John F. Lyons, Joana Sederias, Jean Powers, Hao Xu, Lesley Seymour, Tony Reiman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of AlbertaJuravinski Cancer CentreSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of New BrunswickQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMultiple myelomaAurora inhibitorInternal medicineClinical endpointRefractory (planetary science)OncologyPhases of clinical researchAurora kinaseClinical trialAurora B kinaseGastroenterologyPharmacologyCancerCell cycleCytokinesisChemistryCellBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background:Although outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, it remains an incurable malignancy for which new therapies are needed. Aurora kinases are overexpressed in MM. Inhibition of Aurora A kinase, a key component of the centrosome, in MM cell lines induces apoptotic cell death. Inhibition of Aurora B, a chromosome passenger protein, has therapeutic effects against myeloma lines, primary bone marrow plasma cells and murine xenografts. Histone H3 is a direct downstream substrate of Aurora B. The Aurora A and B kinase inhibitor AT9283 has shown anti-myeloma activity in pre-clinical studies. Based on an NCIC CTG phase I trial in patients with advanced malignancy the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. This single arm phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of AT9283 in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18, neutrophils ≥ 1 and platelets ≥ 70 x109/L. There was no upper limit on the number of prior regimens. The primary endpoint was response rate; secondary endpoints included toxicity and evaluation of potential biomarkers. According to the 2-stage design at least 1 response was required in the first 15 patients to proceed to a full sample size of 30, assuming an HA of ≥ 0.20. Initially AT9283 was administered by 24 hour continuous infusion at the RP2D. Hematological toxicity in the first 2 patients met protocol specified criteria for reduction of the starting dose to 30 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. Phosphorylated Histone H3 (Ser10), a marker of Aurora B activity, and total Histone H3 protein expression was measured by western blot analysis in baseline and day 21 bone marrow samples. Results:Over 18 months, eight eligible patients (3 male, 5 female) with MM (4 IgG, 2 IgA, 2 light chain) were accrued. All were evaluable for toxicity and 7 evaluable for response. Median age was 60 (range 48 – 75). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1 - 5). Patients received between 1 – 4 cycles of AT9283 (median 1) with 25% of patients receiving ≥ 90% of the planned dose intensity. No responses were observed. The trial was closed due to slow accrual and toxicity, in particular myelosuppression. Transient neutropenia occurred in all patients (63% grade 3, 37% grade 4). Recovery from nadir to normal range was rapid in the majority (range 1 – 8 days, median 5) but prolonged in 2 patients who were neutropenic at baseline (11 and 13 weeks). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 50% of patients. There were 3 infections ≥ grade 3 including 1 death. Grade 3 skin ulceration thought possibly related to AT9283 by the investigator occurred in 1 patient. The most common non-hematologic adverse events reported as possibly, probably or definitely related to AT9283 were grade 1-3 nausea (50%), grade 1 and 3 vomiting (38%), grade 4 febrile neutropenia (25%), grade 1/2 anorexia (25%), grade 1/2 diarrhea (25%) and grade 1/2 fatigue (25%). Paired baseline and day 21 bone marrow samples were provided from 4 patients; sufficient protein was extracted from both samples for western blot analysis from 3 patients. Of these, 2 showed a reduction in Histone 3 phosphorylation (H3-P) after the first cycle of treatment consistent with inhibition of Aurora B. Both of these patients had a best response of stable disease (SD). Abstract 5734. Table Patient Dose (mg/m2) Number of cycles Best response Non-hematological toxicity ≥ Grade 3* Reason off study H3-P/H3Baseline Day 21 1 40 1 PD Gr 3 skin ulceration Toxicity 0.3 0.5 2 40 1 SD Gr 3 lung infection Intercurrent illness 1.6 0.5 3 30 3 SD None PD 0.6 0.5 4 30 1 PD Gr 4 febrile neutropenia & gr 4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction Toxicity NE NE 5 30 1 NE Gr 4 febrile neutropenia & gr 5 sepsis** Death NE NE 6 30 4 PD Gr 3 nausea & vomiting PD NE NE 7 30 3 SD None PD NE NE 8 30 1 PD None Death NE NE * Reported as possibly, probably or definitely related to AT9283 by investigator ** Neutrophil count recovered to normal range prior to death PD progressive disease, NE not evaluable, Gr grade Conclusions: This study failed to reach full accrual. No objective responses were observed. Administration of AT9283 to patients with previously treated myeloma at this dose and schedule is associated with toxicity, particularly myelosuppression. Disclosures Sandhu: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Reece:Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Lyons:Astex: Employment. Seymour:Astex: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→Travaux en français237 207→