MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Phase II Study of AT9283, an Aurora Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapased or Refractory Multiple Myloma; NCIC Clinical Trials Group IND.191

2014· article· en· W2553702823 on OpenAlexaff
Annette E. Hay, Alli Murugesan, Ashley DiPasquale, Tom Kouroukis, Irwindeep Sandhu, Vishal Kukreti, Nizar J. Bahlis, Johan Lategan, Donna Reece, John F. Lyons, Joana Sederias, Jean Powers, Hao Xu, Lesley Seymour, Tony Reiman

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of AlbertaJuravinski Cancer CentreSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of New BrunswickQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaAurora inhibitorInternal medicineClinical endpointRefractory (planetary science)OncologyPhases of clinical researchAurora kinaseClinical trialAurora B kinaseGastroenterologyPharmacologyCancerCell cycleCytokinesisChemistryCellBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background:Although outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, it remains an incurable malignancy for which new therapies are needed. Aurora kinases are overexpressed in MM. Inhibition of Aurora A kinase, a key component of the centrosome, in MM cell lines induces apoptotic cell death. Inhibition of Aurora B, a chromosome passenger protein, has therapeutic effects against myeloma lines, primary bone marrow plasma cells and murine xenografts. Histone H3 is a direct downstream substrate of Aurora B. The Aurora A and B kinase inhibitor AT9283 has shown anti-myeloma activity in pre-clinical studies. Based on an NCIC CTG phase I trial in patients with advanced malignancy the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. This single arm phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of AT9283 in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18, neutrophils ≥ 1 and platelets ≥ 70 x109/L. There was no upper limit on the number of prior regimens. The primary endpoint was response rate; secondary endpoints included toxicity and evaluation of potential biomarkers. According to the 2-stage design at least 1 response was required in the first 15 patients to proceed to a full sample size of 30, assuming an HA of ≥ 0.20. Initially AT9283 was administered by 24 hour continuous infusion at the RP2D. Hematological toxicity in the first 2 patients met protocol specified criteria for reduction of the starting dose to 30 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. Phosphorylated Histone H3 (Ser10), a marker of Aurora B activity, and total Histone H3 protein expression was measured by western blot analysis in baseline and day 21 bone marrow samples. Results:Over 18 months, eight eligible patients (3 male, 5 female) with MM (4 IgG, 2 IgA, 2 light chain) were accrued. All were evaluable for toxicity and 7 evaluable for response. Median age was 60 (range 48 – 75). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1 - 5). Patients received between 1 – 4 cycles of AT9283 (median 1) with 25% of patients receiving ≥ 90% of the planned dose intensity. No responses were observed. The trial was closed due to slow accrual and toxicity, in particular myelosuppression. Transient neutropenia occurred in all patients (63% grade 3, 37% grade 4). Recovery from nadir to normal range was rapid in the majority (range 1 – 8 days, median 5) but prolonged in 2 patients who were neutropenic at baseline (11 and 13 weeks). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 50% of patients. There were 3 infections ≥ grade 3 including 1 death. Grade 3 skin ulceration thought possibly related to AT9283 by the investigator occurred in 1 patient. The most common non-hematologic adverse events reported as possibly, probably or definitely related to AT9283 were grade 1-3 nausea (50%), grade 1 and 3 vomiting (38%), grade 4 febrile neutropenia (25%), grade 1/2 anorexia (25%), grade 1/2 diarrhea (25%) and grade 1/2 fatigue (25%). Paired baseline and day 21 bone marrow samples were provided from 4 patients; sufficient protein was extracted from both samples for western blot analysis from 3 patients. Of these, 2 showed a reduction in Histone 3 phosphorylation (H3-P) after the first cycle of treatment consistent with inhibition of Aurora B. Both of these patients had a best response of stable disease (SD). Abstract 5734. Table Patient Dose (mg/m2) Number of cycles Best response Non-hematological toxicity ≥ Grade 3* Reason off study H3-P/H3Baseline Day 21 1 40 1 PD Gr 3 skin ulceration Toxicity 0.3 0.5 2 40 1 SD Gr 3 lung infection Intercurrent illness 1.6 0.5 3 30 3 SD None PD 0.6 0.5 4 30 1 PD Gr 4 febrile neutropenia & gr 4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction Toxicity NE NE 5 30 1 NE Gr 4 febrile neutropenia & gr 5 sepsis** Death NE NE 6 30 4 PD Gr 3 nausea & vomiting PD NE NE 7 30 3 SD None PD NE NE 8 30 1 PD None Death NE NE * Reported as possibly, probably or definitely related to AT9283 by investigator ** Neutrophil count recovered to normal range prior to death PD progressive disease, NE not evaluable, Gr grade Conclusions: This study failed to reach full accrual. No objective responses were observed. Administration of AT9283 to patients with previously treated myeloma at this dose and schedule is associated with toxicity, particularly myelosuppression. Disclosures Sandhu: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Reece:Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Lyons:Astex: Employment. Seymour:Astex: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→