MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2556945024 · doi:10.1353/tech.2016.0134

Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool

2016· article· en· W2556945024 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomic JusticeBlueprintEnergy (signal processing)SociologySustainabilityPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsLawLaw and economicsEngineeringEcologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool Paul Hirt (bio) Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge. By Benjamin K. Sovacool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Pp. 304. $100/$29. Benjamin Sovacool’s Energy and Ethics is a blueprint for advancing energy justice at both local and global scales. His energy justice framework includes eight key principles: energy should be widely available, energy should be affordable, decision making should follow due process, energy information should be openly accessible, energy development should prudently manage for long-term sustainability, energy costs and benefits should be distributed equitably in the present as well as intergenerationally, and finally, energy systems should responsibly mitigate externalities, make harmed communities whole, and protect the health of the biotic communities of our planet. After Sovacool’s concise introduction, each chapter in the book elaborates one of these eight principles through a specific case study. Methodically organized, each has an introduction to the principle, a history of the case study, and a discussion of the benefits and challenges of implementing that particular justice principle. Interestingly, the author profiles case studies where a community or a nation or an institution successfully advanced (or at least sought to advance) such a principle. The international scope of Sovacool’s case studies reflects his global ambitions. Across the eight chapters readers learn about energy justice efforts in England, Denmark, Brazil, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Chad, Ecuador, and more. There is also a profile of the World Bank in the chapter on due process. Historians of the United States and Canada should note that there are no case studies of North America. In fact, Canada does not even appear in the index. This is not a global synthesis of energy ethics so much as it is an exploration of energy justice principles illuminated through examples in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. From my perspective, the takeaway messages from this book are fourfold: (1) Energy systems involve far more than technology and economics. Too often we conceive of energy systems or solutions to energy problems as reducible to these two basic components, but that reductionism leads to the kinds of social inequities and environmental harms that Sovacool seeks to remedy. (2) Energy and electrical systems are socially governed, and governance works best when it is transparent, participatory, and attentive to equity and justice principles. (3) Progress toward energy justice is achievable and often profitable. (4) The path to a more just energy system will be founded on clean renewable energy, distributed and democratized energy systems, and international climate policies in which developed countries responsible for most global warming emissions financially assist developing [End Page 1029] countries to shift to carbon-neutral energy systems and adapt to climate change. Admirably, the book is cogently written and moves along at a quick pace. There is no superfluous detail, no opaque digressions into theoretical discourse, and no hyperbole, despite Sovacool’s obvious didactic intentions. He offers arguments with evidence and then leaves readers to do with them as they please. The case studies are clearly elaborated and the implications systematically laid out. It is a model of clarity and accessibility, while at the same time being insightful and provocative. I think Energy and Ethics would make an ideal text in both undergraduate and graduate classes and would stimulate far-ranging class discussions about the ethics of global energy systems. The timing for this book is perfect. We are undoubtedly in the most comprehensive global energy transition since the advent of the internal combustion engine and the invention of electricity. We need to think deeply and collaboratively about the ethical implications of our energy systems as a carbon-neutral, distributed, renewable energy revolution rapidly advances around the world. Paul Hirt Paul Hirt is professor of history and Senior Sustainability Scholar at Arizona State University. He specializes in water, energy, and natural resources, with an emphasis on sociotechnological systems and the evolution of environmental policy. Copyright © 2016 The Society for the History of Technology

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,810
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,803

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle