MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556945024 · doi:10.1353/tech.2016.0134

Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool

2016· article· en· W2556945024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul W. Hirt

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticeBlueprintEnergy (signal processing)SociologySustainabilityPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsLawLaw and economicsEngineeringEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool Paul Hirt (bio) Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge. By Benjamin K. Sovacool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Pp. 304. $100/$29. Benjamin Sovacool’s Energy and Ethics is a blueprint for advancing energy justice at both local and global scales. His energy justice framework includes eight key principles: energy should be widely available, energy should be affordable, decision making should follow due process, energy information should be openly accessible, energy development should prudently manage for long-term sustainability, energy costs and benefits should be distributed equitably in the present as well as intergenerationally, and finally, energy systems should responsibly mitigate externalities, make harmed communities whole, and protect the health of the biotic communities of our planet. After Sovacool’s concise introduction, each chapter in the book elaborates one of these eight principles through a specific case study. Methodically organized, each has an introduction to the principle, a history of the case study, and a discussion of the benefits and challenges of implementing that particular justice principle. Interestingly, the author profiles case studies where a community or a nation or an institution successfully advanced (or at least sought to advance) such a principle. The international scope of Sovacool’s case studies reflects his global ambitions. Across the eight chapters readers learn about energy justice efforts in England, Denmark, Brazil, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Chad, Ecuador, and more. There is also a profile of the World Bank in the chapter on due process. Historians of the United States and Canada should note that there are no case studies of North America. In fact, Canada does not even appear in the index. This is not a global synthesis of energy ethics so much as it is an exploration of energy justice principles illuminated through examples in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. From my perspective, the takeaway messages from this book are fourfold: (1) Energy systems involve far more than technology and economics. Too often we conceive of energy systems or solutions to energy problems as reducible to these two basic components, but that reductionism leads to the kinds of social inequities and environmental harms that Sovacool seeks to remedy. (2) Energy and electrical systems are socially governed, and governance works best when it is transparent, participatory, and attentive to equity and justice principles. (3) Progress toward energy justice is achievable and often profitable. (4) The path to a more just energy system will be founded on clean renewable energy, distributed and democratized energy systems, and international climate policies in which developed countries responsible for most global warming emissions financially assist developing [End Page 1029] countries to shift to carbon-neutral energy systems and adapt to climate change. Admirably, the book is cogently written and moves along at a quick pace. There is no superfluous detail, no opaque digressions into theoretical discourse, and no hyperbole, despite Sovacool’s obvious didactic intentions. He offers arguments with evidence and then leaves readers to do with them as they please. The case studies are clearly elaborated and the implications systematically laid out. It is a model of clarity and accessibility, while at the same time being insightful and provocative. I think Energy and Ethics would make an ideal text in both undergraduate and graduate classes and would stimulate far-ranging class discussions about the ethics of global energy systems. The timing for this book is perfect. We are undoubtedly in the most comprehensive global energy transition since the advent of the internal combustion engine and the invention of electricity. We need to think deeply and collaboratively about the ethical implications of our energy systems as a carbon-neutral, distributed, renewable energy revolution rapidly advances around the world. Paul Hirt Paul Hirt is professor of history and Senior Sustainability Scholar at Arizona State University. He specializes in water, energy, and natural resources, with an emphasis on sociotechnological systems and the evolution of environmental policy. Copyright © 2016 The Society for the History of Technology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology and CultureSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207