Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge by Benjamin K. Sovacool Paul Hirt (bio) Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge. By Benjamin K. Sovacool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Pp. 304. $100/$29. Benjamin Sovacool’s Energy and Ethics is a blueprint for advancing energy justice at both local and global scales. His energy justice framework includes eight key principles: energy should be widely available, energy should be affordable, decision making should follow due process, energy information should be openly accessible, energy development should prudently manage for long-term sustainability, energy costs and benefits should be distributed equitably in the present as well as intergenerationally, and finally, energy systems should responsibly mitigate externalities, make harmed communities whole, and protect the health of the biotic communities of our planet. After Sovacool’s concise introduction, each chapter in the book elaborates one of these eight principles through a specific case study. Methodically organized, each has an introduction to the principle, a history of the case study, and a discussion of the benefits and challenges of implementing that particular justice principle. Interestingly, the author profiles case studies where a community or a nation or an institution successfully advanced (or at least sought to advance) such a principle. The international scope of Sovacool’s case studies reflects his global ambitions. Across the eight chapters readers learn about energy justice efforts in England, Denmark, Brazil, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Chad, Ecuador, and more. There is also a profile of the World Bank in the chapter on due process. Historians of the United States and Canada should note that there are no case studies of North America. In fact, Canada does not even appear in the index. This is not a global synthesis of energy ethics so much as it is an exploration of energy justice principles illuminated through examples in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. From my perspective, the takeaway messages from this book are fourfold: (1) Energy systems involve far more than technology and economics. Too often we conceive of energy systems or solutions to energy problems as reducible to these two basic components, but that reductionism leads to the kinds of social inequities and environmental harms that Sovacool seeks to remedy. (2) Energy and electrical systems are socially governed, and governance works best when it is transparent, participatory, and attentive to equity and justice principles. (3) Progress toward energy justice is achievable and often profitable. (4) The path to a more just energy system will be founded on clean renewable energy, distributed and democratized energy systems, and international climate policies in which developed countries responsible for most global warming emissions financially assist developing [End Page 1029] countries to shift to carbon-neutral energy systems and adapt to climate change. Admirably, the book is cogently written and moves along at a quick pace. There is no superfluous detail, no opaque digressions into theoretical discourse, and no hyperbole, despite Sovacool’s obvious didactic intentions. He offers arguments with evidence and then leaves readers to do with them as they please. The case studies are clearly elaborated and the implications systematically laid out. It is a model of clarity and accessibility, while at the same time being insightful and provocative. I think Energy and Ethics would make an ideal text in both undergraduate and graduate classes and would stimulate far-ranging class discussions about the ethics of global energy systems. The timing for this book is perfect. We are undoubtedly in the most comprehensive global energy transition since the advent of the internal combustion engine and the invention of electricity. We need to think deeply and collaboratively about the ethical implications of our energy systems as a carbon-neutral, distributed, renewable energy revolution rapidly advances around the world. Paul Hirt Paul Hirt is professor of history and Senior Sustainability Scholar at Arizona State University. He specializes in water, energy, and natural resources, with an emphasis on sociotechnological systems and the evolution of environmental policy. Copyright © 2016 The Society for the History of Technology
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it