A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of the Safety and Efficiacy of Refacto® (Moroctocog Alfa, B-Domain Deleted Recombinant Factor VIII) (St. Louis-Derived Active Substance in the Treatment and Prevension of Bleeding Episodes in Hemophilia a Patients.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This was an open-label, multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study conducted in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland, and UK. The objectives were to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of ReFacto St Louis-derived active substance (STL) in the treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A in the usual care setting. 60 patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C <5%) with no history of FVIII inhibitor were enrolled (58 were previously treated patients and 2 were previously untreated patients). Data on infusions, concomitant medications, adverse events, and inhibitor development were collected from patients at regular intervals. Efficacy for prophylaxis was assessed by the investigator approximately every 3 months until 50 exposure days, 6 months or study termination using the number of breakthrough bleeding episodes and the 3-point scale (excellent, effective, and inadequate). The efficacy of each on-demand treatment administered was assessed using the 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderate, and no response). The investigator and surgeon assessed efficacy of surgical prophylaxis jointly after each surgery using the 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderate, and no response). Factor VIII inhibitor (using local laboratory Bethesda assay) was evaluated at screening, after 10 EDs, after 30 EDs, and at the end of treatment. The investigator determined all dosing and treatment regimens. In the prophylaxis treatment group, no particular prophylaxis regimen was enforced. A total of 32 patients aged 0–66 years initially received prophylaxis treatment: 10 (31%) patients reported no breakthrough bleeds. A median of 6.25 bleeds per year occurred in all prophylaxis patients. Twenty-nine assessments of the prophylactic treatment final outcome were made: 93% of these assessments were excellent or effective. A total of 28 patients aged 1–71 years initially received on-demand treatment with ReFacto STL. 95.2% of bleeds were resolved with 1 or 2 infusions. The assessment of treatment response was excellent or good in 98% of cases. Seven patients underwent 7 surgical procedures, haemostasis was achieved all cases and ReFacto STL was rated as providing an excellent or good response as the final outcome in each case. As this was a post-marketing study, safety evaluation was focused on collection of serious AEs and product-related non-serious AEs. One PTP (1/58, 1.7%) developed a high titre inhibitor and 1/58 (1.7%) developed a low titre transient inhibitor. One PUP developed a low titre transient inhibitor (0.4 BU). SAEs included 1 fatal intracranial hemorrhage (considered unrelated to ReFacto), 5 preplanned surgeries, 1 episode of gastroenteritis, and 1 hemorrhage. There were no allergic events. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment for safety reasons (1 patient due to death, 1 PTP due to high titre inhibitor and 1 PTP due to low titre transient inhibitor). The nature and incidence of non-serious AEs did not raise new safety concerns. The majority of AEs were mild or moderate in severity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».