Influence of the Variable Number of Tandem Repeat and Kozak Sequence Polymorphisms in Platelet GPIbα and the C807t α2 Integrin Polymorphism in Type 1 von Willebrand Disease.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Initial adhesion of platelets to the injured vessel wall involves binding of the glycoprotein (GP)Ib-IX-V complex and integrin α2β1 to von Willebrand factor (VWF) and collagen, respectively, in the subendothelium. Polymorphisms have been described in the GPIbα and α2 genes that change the expression of these proteins or alter their configuration such that the efficiency of platelet adhesion is changed. The variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) size polymorphism of GPIbα may extend the VWF binding domain at variable lengths above the platelet membrane, with variants A, B, C and D having 4, 3, 2 and 1 repeats, respectively; a polymorphism in the Kozak translation consensus sequence for GPIbα appears to predict receptor density. 3 haplotypes of α2 involving C807T have been correlated with α2β1 expression levels. We investigated these polymorphisms in the GPIbα and α2 integrin genes to evaluate the hypothesis that they influence the efficiency of platelet adhesion in the context of the inherited bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD). The study population comprised 47 patients with type 1 VWD and 128 controls. Polymorphism genotyping was performed using restriction enzyme digest analysis of genomic DNA. Frequencies of the GPIbα VNTR alleles were: B=0.05, C=0.81, D=0.14 in the type 1 VWD group and B=0.11, C=0.80, D=0.08 in the controls. These frequencies were not significantly different between the 2 study groups. Genotype frequencies at the VNTR locus were: B/B=0.0, B/C=0.09, B/D=0.02, C/C=0.66, C/D=0.21, D/D=0.02 in the type 1 VWD group and B/B=0.0, B/C=0.20, B/D=0.02, C/C=0.63, C/D=0.13, D/D=0.01 in the controls (P=0.31). C and T Kozak allele frequencies were 0.12 and 0.88, respectively, in the type 1 VWD group and 0.08 and 0.91, respectively, in the controls. These allele frequencies were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Genotype frequencies were: C/C=0.02, C/T=0.20, T/T=0.78 in the type 1 VWD group and C/C=0.01, C/T=0.16, T/T=0.84 in the controls (P=0.61). Frequencies of the α2 alleles 1, 2 and 3 were: 1=0.38, 2=0.47, 3=0.15 in the type 1 VWD group, and 1=0.39, 2=0.50, 3=0.11 in the controls; genotype frequencies were 1/1=0.07, 1/2=0.48, 1/3=0.15, 2/2=0.17, 2/3=0.11, 3/3=0.02 in the type 1 VWD group and 1/1=0.15, 1/2=0.38, 1/3=0.11, 2/2=0.26, 2/3=0.10, 3/3=0.01 in the controls. Neither the allele frequencies nor the genotype distributions at the α2 integrin locus were significantly different between the VWD and control groups. In addition, allele frequencies and genotype distributions at all 3 polymorphic sites were similar to those for previously published controls. Thus, we did not observe any associations between the diagnosis of type 1 VWD and the GPIbα VNTR or Kozak polymorphisms or the α2 integrin polymorphism that determines α2β1 receptor density. Although our observation with the α2 integrin polymorphism is in contrast with that of a recent report that the 807C haplotype is associated with increased bleeding severity scores in type 1 VWD (Kunicki et al., Blood, prepublished online June 29, 2004), our observation with the GPIbα Kozak polymorphism is in accord with this study. Finally, our finding of the 2nd-largest B VNTR allele in the type 1 VWD group at a frequency of ½ that in controls suggests that the lower levels of this larger form of the GPIbα receptor may contribute to an increased bleeding risk in the VWD population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».