MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558531515 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.255.255

Influence of the Variable Number of Tandem Repeat and Kozak Sequence Polymorphisms in Platelet GPIbα and the C807t α2 Integrin Polymorphism in Type 1 von Willebrand Disease.

2004· article· en· W2558531515 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret L. Rand, Iris Hedlund‐Treutiger, Christine Hough, Victor S. Blanchette, David Lillicrap

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand factorVon Willebrand diseasePlatelet membrane glycoproteinLocus (genetics)GeneticsHaplotypeGenotypingGenotypePopulationMolecular biologyPlateletBiologyImmunologyGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Initial adhesion of platelets to the injured vessel wall involves binding of the glycoprotein (GP)Ib-IX-V complex and integrin α2β1 to von Willebrand factor (VWF) and collagen, respectively, in the subendothelium. Polymorphisms have been described in the GPIbα and α2 genes that change the expression of these proteins or alter their configuration such that the efficiency of platelet adhesion is changed. The variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) size polymorphism of GPIbα may extend the VWF binding domain at variable lengths above the platelet membrane, with variants A, B, C and D having 4, 3, 2 and 1 repeats, respectively; a polymorphism in the Kozak translation consensus sequence for GPIbα appears to predict receptor density. 3 haplotypes of α2 involving C807T have been correlated with α2β1 expression levels. We investigated these polymorphisms in the GPIbα and α2 integrin genes to evaluate the hypothesis that they influence the efficiency of platelet adhesion in the context of the inherited bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD). The study population comprised 47 patients with type 1 VWD and 128 controls. Polymorphism genotyping was performed using restriction enzyme digest analysis of genomic DNA. Frequencies of the GPIbα VNTR alleles were: B=0.05, C=0.81, D=0.14 in the type 1 VWD group and B=0.11, C=0.80, D=0.08 in the controls. These frequencies were not significantly different between the 2 study groups. Genotype frequencies at the VNTR locus were: B/B=0.0, B/C=0.09, B/D=0.02, C/C=0.66, C/D=0.21, D/D=0.02 in the type 1 VWD group and B/B=0.0, B/C=0.20, B/D=0.02, C/C=0.63, C/D=0.13, D/D=0.01 in the controls (P=0.31). C and T Kozak allele frequencies were 0.12 and 0.88, respectively, in the type 1 VWD group and 0.08 and 0.91, respectively, in the controls. These allele frequencies were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Genotype frequencies were: C/C=0.02, C/T=0.20, T/T=0.78 in the type 1 VWD group and C/C=0.01, C/T=0.16, T/T=0.84 in the controls (P=0.61). Frequencies of the α2 alleles 1, 2 and 3 were: 1=0.38, 2=0.47, 3=0.15 in the type 1 VWD group, and 1=0.39, 2=0.50, 3=0.11 in the controls; genotype frequencies were 1/1=0.07, 1/2=0.48, 1/3=0.15, 2/2=0.17, 2/3=0.11, 3/3=0.02 in the type 1 VWD group and 1/1=0.15, 1/2=0.38, 1/3=0.11, 2/2=0.26, 2/3=0.10, 3/3=0.01 in the controls. Neither the allele frequencies nor the genotype distributions at the α2 integrin locus were significantly different between the VWD and control groups. In addition, allele frequencies and genotype distributions at all 3 polymorphic sites were similar to those for previously published controls. Thus, we did not observe any associations between the diagnosis of type 1 VWD and the GPIbα VNTR or Kozak polymorphisms or the α2 integrin polymorphism that determines α2β1 receptor density. Although our observation with the α2 integrin polymorphism is in contrast with that of a recent report that the 807C haplotype is associated with increased bleeding severity scores in type 1 VWD (Kunicki et al., Blood, prepublished online June 29, 2004), our observation with the GPIbα Kozak polymorphism is in accord with this study. Finally, our finding of the 2nd-largest B VNTR allele in the type 1 VWD group at a frequency of ½ that in controls suggests that the lower levels of this larger form of the GPIbα receptor may contribute to an increased bleeding risk in the VWD population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207