MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2558769051 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.2.307

<i>The Correspondence of Michael Faraday</i>, edited by Frank A.J.L. James

2013· article· en· W2558769051 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Trevor H. Levere

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian Indigenous Culture and History
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFaraday cageInstitutionArt historyPhilosophyClassicsArtLawPolitical sciencePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Correspondence of Michael Faraday, edited by Frank A.J.L. James. 6 volumes: Volume I: 1811-1831 Volume II: 1832-1840 Volume III: 1841-1848 Volume IV: 1849-1855 Volume V: 1865-1860 Volume VI: 1860-1867 Volumes I-IV, London, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1991-99; volumes V-VI, London, The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2008-12. I: lv + 807 pp., II: lvii + 835 pp., III: lxv + 1,003 pp., IV: lviii + 836 pp., V: xlix + 673 pp., VI: lxi + 919 pp. Set of six volumes: 450 [pounds sterling]/640.40 [pounds sterling] US (cloth). Each volume may be purchased separately. Michael Faraday (1791-1867) is mainly remembered today as a discoverer whose researches established and transformed a new understanding of electricity, and as a pioneer in electro-magnetism, electrochemistry, and the conceptual but non-mathematical adumbration of field theory. He is also remembered for his humble beginnings as the son of a blacksmith who became first a book-binder's apprentice, then Humphry Davy's laboratory assistant, and finally Davy's successor in the Royal Institution of Great Britain, and one of the nineteenth century's leading physicists (although he preferred the title of natural philosopher): in short, the perfect embodiment of the Victorian ideal of self-help. Then there is Faraday the Christian, member of what he called a small sect, the Sandemanians, whose faith exerted a major influence on his life and work. There is also Faraday the lecturer, one who thought early and deeply about the craft of lecturing and the role of experiment therein; he founded the Friday evening discourses and the Christmas lectures for children at the Royal Institution, establishing a tradition that still continues, and promoting what we call the public understanding of science. Always serious, never condescending, he was as brilliant a lecturer as he was an experimentalist and natural philosopher. All these aspects are illuminated by James's edition. But the correspondence reveals a good deal more, and enriches our understanding of the range of Faraday's occupations, the balance among them, and the place of pure and applied science in nineteenth-century British and European society. Faraday was a prolific researcher and became a prolific correspondent. Writing and receiving letters were among his keenest pleasures. As a young man, Faraday wrote that my mind delights to occupy itself in serious subjects (I, p. 39). He was a generous and wonderfully informative correspondent, although it seems unlikely that his mother was as excited as he was by the accounts he sent her of his scientific news from the European tour with Davy. Frank James's newly completed edition runs to over 5,000 pages, and contains 5,053 letters. They range from 1811, when Faraday was twenty years old, until the year before his death. In his final year his wife Sarah wrote for him, and the very last letter in these volumes is a letter of condolence to Sarah from the Prince of Wales. Over seventy per cent of the letters have not been published before. Tracing, collecting, transcribing, editing and annotating these letters were very substantial tasks which occupied James as sole editor (unusually in an age where similar projects have teams of editors) for twenty-six years, and to admirable effect. The letters are arranged chronologically, with a section of the final volume containing 143 undated letters (some of which are approximately dated by James). That volume also contains 306 letters belonging to years covered by previous volumes, but located too late for inclusion in them; more will no doubt turn up. The notes identify people, publications and institutions, and explain events where the letters fail to do so. There is a biographical register of individuals mentioned three or more times in each volume, with an indication of where more detailed information may be found. Those persons occurring fewer than three times are identified in the notes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,257
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,897

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of HistoryMême sujetAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryTravaux en français237 207