MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558769051 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.2.307

<i>The Correspondence of Michael Faraday</i>, edited by Frank A.J.L. James

2013· article· en· W2558769051 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Trevor H. Levere

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian Indigenous Culture and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaraday cageInstitutionArt historyPhilosophyClassicsArtLawPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Correspondence of Michael Faraday, edited by Frank A.J.L. James. 6 volumes: Volume I: 1811-1831 Volume II: 1832-1840 Volume III: 1841-1848 Volume IV: 1849-1855 Volume V: 1865-1860 Volume VI: 1860-1867 Volumes I-IV, London, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1991-99; volumes V-VI, London, The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2008-12. I: lv + 807 pp., II: lvii + 835 pp., III: lxv + 1,003 pp., IV: lviii + 836 pp., V: xlix + 673 pp., VI: lxi + 919 pp. Set of six volumes: 450 [pounds sterling]/640.40 [pounds sterling] US (cloth). Each volume may be purchased separately. Michael Faraday (1791-1867) is mainly remembered today as a discoverer whose researches established and transformed a new understanding of electricity, and as a pioneer in electro-magnetism, electrochemistry, and the conceptual but non-mathematical adumbration of field theory. He is also remembered for his humble beginnings as the son of a blacksmith who became first a book-binder's apprentice, then Humphry Davy's laboratory assistant, and finally Davy's successor in the Royal Institution of Great Britain, and one of the nineteenth century's leading physicists (although he preferred the title of natural philosopher): in short, the perfect embodiment of the Victorian ideal of self-help. Then there is Faraday the Christian, member of what he called a small sect, the Sandemanians, whose faith exerted a major influence on his life and work. There is also Faraday the lecturer, one who thought early and deeply about the craft of lecturing and the role of experiment therein; he founded the Friday evening discourses and the Christmas lectures for children at the Royal Institution, establishing a tradition that still continues, and promoting what we call the public understanding of science. Always serious, never condescending, he was as brilliant a lecturer as he was an experimentalist and natural philosopher. All these aspects are illuminated by James's edition. But the correspondence reveals a good deal more, and enriches our understanding of the range of Faraday's occupations, the balance among them, and the place of pure and applied science in nineteenth-century British and European society. Faraday was a prolific researcher and became a prolific correspondent. Writing and receiving letters were among his keenest pleasures. As a young man, Faraday wrote that my mind delights to occupy itself in serious subjects (I, p. 39). He was a generous and wonderfully informative correspondent, although it seems unlikely that his mother was as excited as he was by the accounts he sent her of his scientific news from the European tour with Davy. Frank James's newly completed edition runs to over 5,000 pages, and contains 5,053 letters. They range from 1811, when Faraday was twenty years old, until the year before his death. In his final year his wife Sarah wrote for him, and the very last letter in these volumes is a letter of condolence to Sarah from the Prince of Wales. Over seventy per cent of the letters have not been published before. Tracing, collecting, transcribing, editing and annotating these letters were very substantial tasks which occupied James as sole editor (unusually in an age where similar projects have teams of editors) for twenty-six years, and to admirable effect. The letters are arranged chronologically, with a section of the final volume containing 143 undated letters (some of which are approximately dated by James). That volume also contains 306 letters belonging to years covered by previous volumes, but located too late for inclusion in them; more will no doubt turn up. The notes identify people, publications and institutions, and explain events where the letters fail to do so. There is a biographical register of individuals mentioned three or more times in each volume, with an indication of where more detailed information may be found. Those persons occurring fewer than three times are identified in the notes. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryFrench-language works237,207