Reduction in Factor VIII Inhibitors Mediated through Tolerogenic Antigen Presentation by immature Dendritic Cells.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Inhibitory antibodies are a major complication of factor VIII (FVIII) treatment in patients with hemophilia A. Hemophilic patients with inhibitors face major challenges in terms of their bleeding treatments and the cost of these therapies. The use of tolerogenic immunotherapy prior to protein replacement therapy represents a novel strategy to prevent the initiation of an immune response directed against FVIII. Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) that play a central role in initiating and directing T−cells towards either immunity or tolerance. We isolated myeloid immature dendritic cells (iDCs) from murine bone marrow and pulsed the cells with FVIII protein or the C2 domain of FVIII (FVIII−iDCs/C2−iDCs) under a non−inflammatory environment and in the presence or absence of anti−inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents such as dexamethasone (Dex) and andrographolide (Andro). One million pulsed−iDCs were infused into a group of five hemophilic Balb/c mice on a weekly basis for three weeks through tail vein injection (iv). Anti−FVIII antibody levels were monitored by functional Bethesda assay after a subsequent challenge with four weekly IV FVIII (2 IU/ml) or C2 (125 ng) injections. Flow cytometry assessment of DC maturation markers indicated that the DCs retained their immature state after pulsing with FVIII or the C2 domain in the presence of Andro or Dex. In vitro proliferation and cytokine release studies using naïve hemophilic mouse CD−4+ T cells and FVIII−iDCs or C2−iDCs in the presence/absence of Dex or Andro showed that the pulsed−iDCs are tolerogenic and result in a marked reduction in the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. We then studied the tolerogenic potential of FVIII−iDCs and C2−iDCs in vivo. We infused pulsed−iDCs that were cultured in the presence or absence of Dex/Andro into naïve hemophilic mice. We observed a 20% and 70% reduction in the levels of FVIII inhibitors in mice that received FVIII−iDCs or C2−iDCs respectively after FVIII or C2 challenges in comparison to control mice that only received FVIII or C2 challenges. Mice that received FVIII−iDCs were re−challenged with 2 IU of FVIII 10 weeks after the last of the four consecutive FVIII challenges. Our results indicate that these mice still showed a 25% reduction in the levels of FVIII inhibitors after the re−challenge suggesting that iDCs were able to induce a tolerogenic memory response against FVIII. The in vivo studies for FVIII pulsed iDCs in the presence of Andro are still in progress. In aggregate, these studies indicate that the administration of immature DCs pulsed with FVIII or the C2 domain of FVIII can significantly reduce the immune response to FVIII following subsequent IV challenges. However, this immunotherapeutic strategy does not completely abolish the anti−FVIII response, suggesting that additional supplementary approaches will be necessary to prevent the development of this treatment−related complication.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».