<i>Wild Frenchmen and Frenchified Indians: Material Culture and Race in Colonial Louisiana</i>, by Sophie White
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Wild Frenchmen and Frenchified Indians: Material Culture and Race Colonial Louisiana, by Sophie White. Early American Studies Series. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. x. 325pp. $45.00 US (cloth). In the North American empire of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, colonial officials hoped to Frenchify Native Americans, and convert them to ways of living. At the same time, they worried that Frenchmen might lose their own civilized identity, particularly on the margins of empire where colonists lived among more numerous Native American peoples and alongside African slaves. One such margin of empire was Illinois Country where, throughout the eighteenth century, Natives Americans, Africans, and people interacted and converted, forming close relations and living integrated lives. Clothing and material culture were important components of these interactions and conversions. Amid disagreements among administrators and colonists over the meanings of differences, and against the backdrop of emerging notions of racial identity, people Illinois and Louisiana used material culture--particularly dress--to claim, assert, change, and maintain identities. This is an impressively original book, with fascinating insights throughout. Deeply researched, the book makes creative use of numerous difficult sources, particularly notarial archives, the Louisiana Superior Council Records, and extensive administrative documents. Sophie White combs these mostly textual sources for the material stuff of the past. In so doing, she recreates the look and feel of Illinois Country and colonial Louisiana, revealing how important the visual symbols of dress, the built environment, geography, and the physical body were to the way that people experienced their world, and expressed their identities. White shows that the colonial dream of Frenchification was largely achieved the villages of Illinois as numerous Native American women married fur traders and farmers the frontier villages. The first three chapters reveal how these wives embraced a world, living houses, wearing clothing, and living in the manner. While Chapter Two explains the indigenous traditions through which this conversion may have been experienced, White concludes that Native American women mostly inhabited, and were accepted into, a world. The most important way they embraced identity was their sartorial performance--the way that they dressed (p. 31). Going against accepted understandings of intermarriages between Native American women and Frenchmen, White demonstrates that the women thoroughly adopted a French identity Illinois Country villages. In the second part of the book, White examines cultural cross-dressing Lower Louisiana, where identity was not so flexible. Marie Turpin, a daughter bom to a mixed-race couple Kaskaskia, was accepted as a nun among the Ursulines 1751. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».