Review of the Agriculture of Lower Canada, With Suggestions for Its Amelioration: First Published in a Series of Communications, in the "Montreal Gazette,"
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
duty than to endeavour to understand this cause, and s'rive to provide a remedy.It is a public and genetal loss, to have good land occupied, and labor and seed applied in its cultivation, in so defective a maimer, that it doss not yield remunerative retnrns, or such returns as would be quite possible to realise under more skilful and judicious management.With an industrious and intelligent soil generally is trior to any I have seen in North America, and our climate is not unfavorable for the production of a variety of crops in perfection, because I have seen them in the greatest perfect'on With all these facts before us, why should we be second to any country in agriculture?f met a gentleman lately, who has been for ' many years in the provision trade, between North America and the We4 Indies, and he told me that Canadian beef was considered lean and of inferior quality to the beef of the United States, and this 1 am disposed to be- lieve, irom the sort of cattle I have frequently seen slaughtered and packed in Montreal.He also said that flour from some States of the Union was superior to any from Canada, and he attributed this to the flour being dryer and closer packed, and said that the barrels were smaller in size by one-eighth than the Canadian barrels for the same weight of flour, and this he considered preserved the flour better, by excluding the air.I mention these circumstances without pretending to vouch for their correctness as regards flour.If there is any fault in the management of those matters, they should be remedied, and the character of our products maintained in every part of the world they may be sent to.With regard to the character of Canadian flour in the West Indies, I may have been correctly informed.If the wheat is damp, or frozen, and made into flour in this state, with- out kiln drying, it would not keep well sub- quently.It is of great importance that this matter should be enquired into.the farmer is not so much to blame for the bad character of the flour, though the grower of wheat must suffer if the flour will not maintain a good character in foreign markets.Our country is and ought to be a produce country, and it is of the greatest importance to the producer that the character of the produce even after it passes out of the hands of the grower, should be maintained good.Wheat that is stacked out, unless carefully thatched, after the stacks are well made, is very liable to imbibe more or less moisture, and in that csfce the grain cannot be perfectly dry, and may become frozen.If this is a common occurrence, it is very probable the grain may not be perfectly dry when made into flour, and of course the flour cannot, keep so well as if the grain was dry.Is there any excuse for keeping cattle until they are two, three or four years old, and then selling them for beef, when there is no beef
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,034 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».